Sorry for my extended absence! I have been busy writing rude letters to the New Yorker. Exciting stuff coming soon but in the meantime:
– Good title!
– excellent
– glorious!
– !!! HEAPS OF MOUNTAINS!
– confusing–the women spent their time educating young girls?
– kind of confusing to bring up music but then dive into economic history!
– nice
– nice!
– key term! it was an age of fetishizing the machine for sure
– not sure how these two paragraphs relate
– crucial! Only value is usefulness = very 18th century
– abrupt transition!
– and more importantly, it was disturbing that a Revolution literally based on the Enlightenment’s rationalist philosophies so quickly became irrational
– ??? IT IS???
– awk
– try not to conclude with grand vague proclamations about life
– I could’ve read a whole paper just on the horse manual!
– good hook!
– Perhaps overstating the importance of musicians in this context…
– what?
– nice
– awk
– Well, wasn’t this what the French Revolution was about?
– what does this have to do with a fancy piano concerto? Are Liszt’s piano concertos not fancy?
– what’s this from
– NO. Much, much older. 16th century at least
– need more explanation of how this relates to “science”
– ?? Proofread!
– The Baroque?
– single-space block quotes
– your paper has not explored this
– !! really strange analogy!
– this sentence is tautological: “opera reigned in the staging of opera”
– ! Tautology! Come see me
– Gluck is “unrecognized”?
– I’m really confused
– but artists with patrons weren’t “starving,” that’s the whole point
– confused as to your chronology here
– This makes it sound like Haydn was unpopular
– nice metaphor! I LOVE IT
– clear paragraph
– nice
– good
– single-space block quotes
– ?
– ??!!
– not really!
– try to make your prose less rote and mechanical
– I agree, but you’d need to explain what you mean here
– rephrase
– nice word!
– ? what reason
– single-space block quotes
– dangling modifier
– What’s “it?”
– I don’t see how this quote illustrates what you just said
– need to introduce quotations–you’re just arbitrarily sticking them in
– ? how would this work
– non sequitur
– How? This is a weird idea
– crazy but true!
– Nice–I’ve got some cool stuff for you to read if you want to know more
– also to TEACH–to show balanced natural perfection as a model
– these 2 thoughts seem unrelated…
– hmmm…I think of this as more of a Romantic ideal
– good
– how does this quote represent resistance? Seems approving
– What’s “it?”
– Could use some specifics here…there’s certainly “folly” in earlier literature, e.g.
– What? The Romantic Era??
– Fun title!
– good
– muddy
– combine these sentences
– single-space block quotes
– confusing prose
– passive voice
– What’s “it?”
– elegant!
– kind of awk
– he’s so famous that this seems weird–just say “Schubert”
– you’re really good at finding the perfect quote
– Judeo-Christian value structure
– abrupt!
– kind of confusing
– proofread!
– can’t say “during Europe”
– What’s “it?”
– single-space block quotes
– Wow! Interesting town
– !! SO CRAZY!!
– :(
– this doesn’t include opera though
– yes, this is strange isn’t it!
– yes, and it made them crazy!!
– yeah cool! I get it now
– classic Queen Victoria…
– wow
– all novels are fiction
– need a segue here
– in the brutal world of industrialized capitalism!
– Waugh famously loathed children and was a horrible father
– 16th century is also very TEXT focused–it’s different to be conveying this stuff INSTRUMENTALLY
– give a fun example of a critic freaking out
– heavy!
– versus
– well, it was the case back then! Genres don’t define themselves
– “the Classical Era” is the “mother” in this analogy??
– “squishes” is such an intense word in this context…sort of horrifying
– this paragraph is REALLY confusing
– single-space block quotes
– combine some of these short, declarative sentences into longer ones
– Also the Grimms’ fairy tales (19thc) are so weird and often have REALLY unclear lessons
– cool way to put it
– But what does this have to do with art?
– hmm…you’re suddenly really far away from art/nature stuff
– give an example! Like how she calls women “spaniel-like”
– not at court operas! Obnoxious audience behavior is associated with public operas
– No. The opposite! Not for fancy people!
– can’t use wikipedia as a source
– What’s “it?”
– ? Weird sentence
– Not sure where this is going
– ? Why are you talking so much about whistling?
– See, but this doesn’t sound like a carnival
– But you said audiences back then were obnoxious too
– intense word
– aren’t these two clauses saying the same thing?
– confusing. This quote is describing ancient greek music
– so, they DIDN’T always use myths, or what?
– this quote is about the opposite
– why are you suddenly talking about the Romantic Era?
– what does this piano stuff have to do with opera?
– single-space block quotes
– Hmmmm you’re confused. Instrumental music in the 18th c is certainly not “supposed to have narrative”
– but this is vocal music
– ! Scholars aren’t “of” their publisher
– “Doctors” aren’t really “romantic” in the sense you mean
– Well, it’s EXACTLY the same. “Paying to listen to a performer” = “spending money on a concert”
– tautology
– this is a concerto, not a symphony!
So…I’m supposed to double-space block quotes, then?
I love this time every year. Please never stop.
Given my own notorious difficulties with conclusion-writing, I will strive to take your advice: “try not to conclude with grand vague proclamations about life.”
are you writing these comments in (ideally red) ink on actual ‘papers’ like we oldyloxes used to have to turn in? or do you have like MS Word Teachers Edition where you can ~in a way~ hyper-textually “mark up” so to speak, ‘the (submitted) “text”‘?
Real papers/red ink!!
I love how obvious it is that every single person who has ever graded a paper has written “awk” over and over and over. And the pronouns with no antecedent! CLASSIC. Also, we need to hang out!! (On the internet I guess, IDK)
“during Europe”!!!!
Give a fun example of a critic freaking out.