It’s good to remember how fascinating and beautiful conversation can be. Starting from scratch, two performers begin to share their knowledge and experience across a cultural distance. Conversation can be messy, this one is careful and deliberate, slowly building – it takes nothing for granted. This conversation accomplishes the goal of anthropology – to hold a mirror up to one’s own culture. In having to explain everything, we might get at the root of what we no longer examine – those decisions which are cultural givens, and those which are personal reactions. …getting to the “why” under the “why”. So many of our decisions about how to make or view art are based on some kind of assumption (“Art should be beautiful.” “Art should take a lot of work.” “Art should be unfettered personal expression.” etc.) To witness a conversation which peels back these layers – a conversation which practices listening, observation and patience. What a simple, complicated, brilliant idea for a performance. Pinchet describes a form in which every gesture has significance, a system which is tied directly to religion, architecture and folklore – codes which are embedded in every movement. Jerome describes a form which is open, unpredictable, anti-spectacle. A form where codes exist in the slippage of personal and cultural meanings. Both describe their position on a cultural fringe – performing for limited and specialized audiences, often performing for audiences that don’t understand.
The form of this conversation is standardized but flexible, and I’ve heard that each time they ask a new question or find a new answer during a show, they must decide whether or not to keep it in, to avoid a piece which would quickly expand to 4 or 5 hours. Pinchet describes characters who take twenty minutes to walk slowly across the stage, letting the significance of a death exert its full weight in a story which, in its entirety, would take a week to perform. Jerome describes a similar process for a very different attention span – lying motionless during the second half of a 5 minute song. Both reveal an art which is interested in opening space for the experiencer to think, feel, and reflect. Understanding takes time.
– Seth Nehil
Urban Honking
is a community of writers, visual artists, musicians, filmmakers, and other great humans.
-
Recent Posts
@p_i_c_a
-
58 mins ago
T @edibleportland: Thank you @P_I_C_A for chance to try out wild salmon grilling. Lola needed a little time to get used to those coals! ht… -
4 hours ago
cmonlanguage continues tomorrow with 1st of Craycroft's weekly events—1st up is #TBA11 alum Ohad Meromi's Flat Dance http://t.co/PmqOgubR0a
-
58 mins ago
resourceroom.tumblrRecent Comments
- Marty Kinsella on A Taxonomy of Chairs
- laura becker on A Taxonomy of Chairs
- Rosine Evans on A Taxonomy of Chairs
- Rosine Evans on Bookmarks
- Bryan Markovitz on Nature Theater of Oklahoma
Archives
- March 2013
- February 2013
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- April 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
Categories
Meta