The Double Life of Alice B. Sheldon

AliceBSheldon.jpg

As you may remember from a previous Space Canon entry, Alice B. Sheldon was, for a decade, the science-fiction writer James Tiptree Jr. She used the pseudonym because writing science fiction was a guilty pleasure, but also because she was sick of being “the first woman in some damned occupation.” Tiptree ranks among the greats of the genre, and Alice was no different: a terrible powerhouse of a woman, who spent her childhood in the unspoiled Congo and World War II in a Pentagon sub-basement.

Julie Phillips’ James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life of Alice B. Sheldon tells the story of this incredible person, who struggled with a whole heap of things, including a tragically sublimated homosexuality; on trying to be normal, Alice only achieved “delicate tension” which she described as “endless makeshift.” She rebelled, sometimes dejectedly, against a world which didn’t allow for unusual, self-directed women. Born into Chicago high society and surrounded by cotillions and finishing schools, other women and their concerns seemed Martian; over the course of her many careers, she perpetually found herself the only woman in a sea of men, who she identified with much more than her female counterparts. Eventually, Alice concluded that “the only way to survive as an intelligent woman was to think of herself as a secret exception — not really a woman at all.”

Hence, eventually, the masculine pseudonym.

“Tiptree,” initially only a pen-name, quickly turned into an entirely separate male personality, one which enabled Alice to say subversive things and talk authoritatively about all the traditionally un-feminine aspects of her life, like her military experience, hard science, and shooting elephants in the Belgian Congo. To keep her true identity concealed, she had to insinuate a career in Intelligence, a sense that Tiptree was the alias of a hush-hush government official: an entirely separate, decade-long narrative, a masterwork in itself.

Alice was complicated, interesting, and heart-wrenchingly relatable-to; her biographer writes with real insight, no easy task for the story of a notoriously secretive woman who occasionally used her CIA experience to vanish for weeks at a time. To wit, Alice on her own psyche: “I live way within, in the unformed, unchallenging depths, occasionally lashing out at someone with a tongue-whip of words, a severe glitter — ‘See, I contain marvels!’ — then whisk, back into the hole.”

ALICEWRITING.jpg

This book awakened a monster inside me.

Here is this brilliant person, so dissatisfied with the conditions of her (admittedly incredible) life, and to realize that I have the formidable privilege of having been born when I was, into a world where my self-possesed weirdness, my terror of carrying out a conventional life, my questioning, where nothing and no one that I want is very much impossible, and where the demands of the status quo have calcified to the point of being unappealing to even the mainstream…what luck has unfairly befallen me. What an injustice to Alice, who could have used the break.

I’m rarely roused to feminist ire. I was raised without the notion of inferiority and my personal manifest destiny has never been trampled by Man; I identify conceptually, but there’s precious little fuel for my fire. Reading about Alice B. Sheldon has been revelatory, because unlike suffragettes and Gloria Steinem, she was like me (although, clearly, a genius). The way she considered the world, her conflicts, her totally self-sufficient, inscrutable personal universe, her disastrous relationships, her little perversities and vices, her interests and fears — it’s like reading about a more interesting version of myself. To discover that this woman, this lost sister, had to waste a single instant of her precious time on Earth fighting against entrenched patriarchies — in the army, in the CIA, in academia — it’s intolerable. I imagine myself in her situation, just trying to be my weird self in a world full of boring expectations, and it makes me feel hopeless, too. Alice might’ve given up on being creative if she hadn’t become James Tiptree Jr.

Which, incidentally, makes me even more thankful for Science Fiction (G bless it), a jolly universe full of stringy-haired Futurians, who immediately recognized the Tiptree voice as that of a fellow outsider, and lavished understanding praise upon its violent, sexed, fresh vision. Harlan Ellison told Tiptree, “Nobody touches you!” Philip K. Dick admitted to being “humbled and nettled” by Tiptree, whose work he found “damn good.” Alice scrapped for her whole life against a conservative world that didn’t get her, and here she was, in her fifties, as a man, finally got.

By the time her secret was uncovered, Tiptree was a legend, and she had placed herself at the vortex of a massive sea-change in the depiction of gender in science fiction. By pulling the wool over everyones’ eyes, she revealed the truth. And it took a lie to do it.

NEXT BOOK: CLIFFORD D. SIMAK’S A CHOICE OF GODS

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Galaxies Like Grains of Sand

GalaxiesLikeGrainsofSand.jpg

Galaxies Like Grains of Sand is a short novel comprised of even shorter stories, presented in roughly chronological order, covering a billion year spree of humanity (I have to wonder if Brian Aldiss took a page from Olaf Stapledon’s Last and First Men). The sections are broken into ages, long eras of the future, with names like “The Robot Millennia,” and “The Mutant Millennia.”

Galaxies, originally released in the UK in 1959 as The Canopy of Time, is the kind of science fiction novel that I find immediately compelling; Ray Bradbury’s The Martian Chronicles, the first science fiction book I ever read (an obvious game-changer) has a similar format. It’s wildly romantic, like reading the pottery shards of the ancient future, but coldly logical, too, in a way: how else do you write about such extreme lengths of time, such broad reaches of space, than to forsake 99% of what “happened”?

There is no time for the full story: only meager shreds from the perspectives of many, giving a rough sense of a structure — something much more massive than the reader. Over the course of the book, humanity evolves and devolves, leaves Earth for so long as to forget it ever existed, travels through time, changes from warring to robotic, sexless, primitive, collective, mutant. We achieve great things — stylized culture, self-perpetuating, harmless war, a transcendent language which enables us to travel in space — and just as quickly forget them. Nothing remains the same, despite the characters’ desire for permanence.

In Galaxies, humanity is implicitly on trial; if we buy into the artistic conceit that it is a compilation of stories from the lifespan of the long-dead Homo Sapiens, then we become members of the next race, the one which has superseded the follies of the past (er, our present). Moreover, we become jurors. We are led to view the first race as plucky, if eventually harmless. And tragic.

Which, of course, is us. Aye, the rub.

As Aldiss wrote in a later work, The Malacia Tapestry, “we all stand condemned in the terrible forests of the Universe.”

NEXT BOOK: JAMES TIPTREE JR: THE DOUBLE LIFE OF ALICE B. SHELDON

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Brightness Falls From The Air

BrightnessFalls.jpg

“Brightness falls from the air” is a line from A Litany in Time of Plague, a death-themed Elizabethan poem by Thomas Nashe:

Beauty is but a flower
Which wrinkes will devour;
Brightness falls from the air,
Queens have died young and fair,
Dust hath closed Helen’s eye.
I am sick, I must die.
Lord, have mercy on us!

The line, both unlikely and modern, is perhaps what Nashe is best remembered for: T.S. Eliot wrote about it at length, and, in James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, the protagonist Stephen Dedalus meditates on it extensively, despite misremembering it as “Darkness falls from the air.” Unfortunately, most literary scholars believe “air” is a typographic error; Nashe probably meant “hair,” which makes considerably more sense in the context of the poem. If the typo hadn’t occurred, Nashe would almost certainly be a footnote in poetic history; could he have known that one misplaced letter could make his name? Doubt not the power of well-chosen (or accidentally-chosen) words to make history.

In any case, the typo prevailed over the centuries, and the line eventually became the title of a science fiction novel by James Tiptree, Jr. Unfortunately, the title is probably the best thing about Tiptree’s novel. Brightness Falls From The Air is a good story, involving an isolated outpost of keepers on a distant planet, charged with studying and protecting a vulnerable, beautiful alien race that had been roundly abused by humans in the past. There are some interesting themes, about the destruction of beauty and how it’s the worst of all crimes, and Tiptree has an elegant style. Nevertheless, the whole thing is encased like in a block of lucite in a deep and complicated parlor drama among its characters, a motley crew of “wacky” aliens and people, thrown together in extenuating circumstances like a long, tiring sitcom (or space opera).

This isn’t to say that I hated this novel or have anything particularly virulent to say about it. There was story, but nothing subversive, funny, no subtext, nothing for me to get excited about. No gristle.

I had great hopes about Tiptree, because of the writer’s history: James Tiptree Jr. is actually Alice B. Sheldon, a lady science fiction author who decided to cut through the crap and just pretend to be a dude for most of her career, in order to get published. It wasn’t until the late 1970s that her true identity was revealed, much to the embarrassment of critics who had praised “his” work over the decades. She’s known now as being a catalyst for the overall maturing of SF at the end of the 20th century; The James Tiptree, Jr. Award is given in her honor every year for a work of science fiction or fantasy that expands or explores our understanding of gender. Besides, she seems like she was a really cool woman: a liberal bisexual who worked for the CIA. Of her pseudonym, she said, “I had the feeling that a man would slip by less observed. I’ve had too many experiences in my life of being the first woman in some damned occupation.”

From what I can gather, Brightness is both Tiptree’s best-known and least-liked work, and the short stories are what’s really good, so I will be happy to give him (well, her) another chance.

NEXT BOOK: BRIAN ALDISS’ GALAXIES LIKE GRAINS OF SAND

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Odd John and Sirius

OddJohn.jpg

Odd John and Sirius are two novels by Olaf Stapledon, paired together in a dual edition. This is not a thoughtless choice, as both novels are explorations of the same idea, manifested slightly differently: what happens when a superhuman intelligence is introduced into a human world? How long can it survive?

When I say “superhuman intelligence,” I don’t mean “Albert Einstein.” I mean creatures with a level of intelligence that makes them superior to others in the same way that humans are to, say, domestic cats. Stapledon’s protagonists represent a substantial step forward in evolution; they are intelligences that render their bearers patently inhuman, in one case a new species entirely (Homo Superior).

The titular Odd John is the epitome of such an intelligence: a boy born in rural England with inconceivable powers, who understands the limitations of the human world while still in his crib. He is powerful, an inventor, hypnotic, capable of traveling through time mentally, but incapable of using regular language to communicate his experiences to “normals,” namely the one who narrates the novel. The result is that the reader gets only a hazy understanding of John’s “real” intellectual life — which is, incidentally, totally impervious to human moral codes — discovering only the confused fragments that a devoted human intelligence could put together.

Of course, John is doomed. After a long spiritual struggle with the essential truths which he alone understands, he begins to discover that the universe may be indifferent to intelligence, no matter how refined. Unfettered, he founds a colony of Homo Superiors in the South Pacific, which becomes a utopia of the mind for several years before it is discovered. After a fitful psionic war with the “normals,” John and his fellow Homo Superiors inexplicably destroy their own island, killing themselves in the process.

Odd John is kind of an eldritch tale: what did these supernormals know? Why did they kill themselves? Sirius, the second book of the novels twain, is less foreboding: it’s about a genetically manipulated alsatian with the mind of a man, but the body (and instincts) of a dog. Smart as any other member of his human family, with which he converses in a sort of barking pidgin English, he struggles his entire life with a laundry list of insecurities: his handlessness, his inability to see color or appreciate visual art, the fact that his hyper-sensitive hearing makes human music painful, and the dark bloody drives of his canine self. Sirius is a human spirit, but he isn’t human either; as a singular being in the world, with the earnest heart of a domestic dog, the conflicts that torture him are tragic and ultimately unresolvable.

What’s refreshing about Olaf Stapledon, ultimately, is that although he wrote in the early 20th century, his work isn’t particularly representative of the greater literary tendencies of that period. Odd John and Sirius were both penned in the 1930s; While the Modernists were raging and “the novel” was being completely reinvented, and Story (capital S) was falling to the wayside in favor of fragmented, alienated texts, Stapledon was writing weirdly matter-of-fact, heady, narrative books about dogs with human intelligence. Both Odd John and Sirius feel like serial novels from some Dickensian 19th century universe; a quality that evokes earlier science-fiction writers, like H.G. Wells and Jules Verne, who were great one-chapter-after-another writers.

Only with Stapledon, the earnest linearity has something methodically sinister about it: here, story is a winding path to doom, to unjust, irrational death. You have to keep going, because it is written forwards, but you don’t want to see the end: a massive alsatian lying broken and bloody on a Welsh hillside, half-wild, half-martyr.

NEXT BOOK: JAMES TIPTREE JR.’S BRIGHTNESS FALLS FROM THE AIR

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?

Androids.jpg

This is the deal: it’s impossible for me to separate Phililp K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? from its film adaptation, Blade Runner.

This is because I’ve seen Blade Runner approximately 4,000 times, and because my science fiction-obsessed college professors would always build elaborate paper castles of syllabi, heavy on the words “dystopia” and “postmodern,” just so that they could teach Dick, but ultimately it was always Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, so everyone I knew just relied on their knowledge of Blade Runner rather than do the reading. And so did I, apparently; hence, all my discussions of the book have really just been about half-remembered things from Blade Runner.

The aforementioned problem almost ruined the book for me. The whole experience of reading it was fraught with attempts to conjure up equivalent scenes from the film. Darryl Hannah with her crazy legs akimbo, Harrison Ford eating ramen noodles in the rain, the dark L.A. pyramids of the Rosen corporation. At a certain point I no longer remembered what had happened in the film, and what happened in the book, or vice-versa. Which is fitting, I suppose, for a story revolving around the distinctions between human and android, the latter of which is so sophisticated as to be almost indistinguishable from humanity, and the moral position of a hunter (a “retirer”) of rogue androids.

Also, when I picked up my copy of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? at the library, a dollar bill fell out.

I found this appropriate because the novel is fundamentally about the failure of human systems to serve as arbiters of value. What is the difference, for example, between an artificial thing and a “real” one if they serve the exact same purpose, have the same market value? Androids are designed to be servants, and they only have a market value as workers, a value that is depreciated if they liberate themselves and choose to live a life of servitude — not to a master, but to their own needs. But still, they are beings which take up space in the world, which breathe and exhaust resources, which have a desire to integrate in human society. And so their value is similar to ours, if not identical.

Ultimately, it’s perception that defines everything: whether you are human or a sophisticated android that just looks human, the importance of your life, insofar as everyone else is concerned, is the same. It’s no one’s purview to murder you just because you’re incapable of empathy. Or so we are led to believe. As Marilyn Gwaltney notes in her essay, Androids as a Device for Reflection on Personhood, which can be found in the excellent compendium Retrofitting Blade Runner, “the androids are clearly human beings, but are they persons? Do they have ‘selves?’ We cannot answer that question until we define what a self is, and what it means to be a person.” The idea, then, is that our understanding of selfhood is so nuanced, so flawed (attributes which, incidentally, elude androidkind) that we are left with nothing, with which to judge nothing.

Blade Runner looks like Dick’s novel in the same way that androids look like humans; in a way, it’s exactly the same. The habitual guidelines do not stand: as the story is about originals and copies, we are left with the realization that it’s impossible to judge a copy, for we may be copies ourselves.

NEXT BOOK: OLAF STAPLEDON’S ODD JOHN AND SIRIUS

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

The Santaroga Barrier

SantarogaBarrier.jpg

Frank Herbert is one of my heroes, for a number of reasons: his incredible commitment to portraying the whole ecology of a fictional environment, his sly allusions to philosophy, the overwhelming headiness of his work, his Northwest roots. This devotion, however, is entirely based on the commanding Dune series, which, as it has for many people, radically changed my approach to this genre; The Santaroga Barrier is the first non-Dune Herbert novel I’ve ever read.

The Santaroga Barrier is a Heideggerian trip steeped in a deep tradition of Pod People, Puppet Master, Freudian “uncanny,” Wicker Man, and Body Snatcher story archetypes: in a small town, everything seems normal, but something is undeniably off, otherworldly. In this case, it’s Santaroga, a Northern California valley town that resists outside influence with maddeningly self-satisfied intensity. Market researchers refer to it as the “Santaroga Barrier;” enter Gilbert Dasein, a psychologist sent to expose the real reason why outside businesses fail in the region and Santarogans never leave their valley. On arrival, Dasein finds out that he is only the most recent in a series of investigators, all of whom have died in bizarre, but explainable accidents. The vibe is tense, weird, and hyper-normal. People resist his inquiries at every turn. He finds himself acting irrationally, climbing onto the roof of his hotel and sneaking through factories in the dead of night, fueled by a creeping sensation of something wrongness. Quickly, he discovers “Jaspers,” an additive in all Santarogan food; Jaspers is a consciousness-enhancing drug, fungal in nature, which makes all Santarogans creepily alert and fosters some kind of subconscious group mind. Dasein begins to narrowly avoid fatal accidents, one after another, and finds that his presence as an outsider has offended the group mind, the communal id, of Santaroga: he must integrate, or be killed unwittingly.

Santaroga itself is an enticing community (“we take care of our own,” everyone says) and integration presents a significant dilemma. Would Dasein be happy to tune in and drop out forever, lulled by the Jaspers into a communal small-town life, or can he hold out long enough to return to “reality,” a world of pronounced individualism? As the novel progresses, we begin to lose steam, forget the benefits of the real outside world — I don’t think I would have lasted a day in the Santaroga valley.

The notion of a consciousness-enhancing drug is evidently an obsession of Frank Herbert’s, and it’s not difficult to see traces of Dune’s “The Spice” in the “Jaspers” of the Santaroga valley. Here is a society entirely controlled by a single rare and dangerous psychoactive. The question for me is, was Frank Herbert exploiting a late-60s fascination with psychedelia in order to sell books which were essentially about Being and transcendence, ecology and human evolution; or was he just really into acid?

My bet is on the former. The drug, be it Jaspers, Spice, or LSD, seems to be just a physical justification — a tool — for philosophical inquiry; Herbert named the Santaroga drug after Karl Jaspers, a German psychiatrist who wrote that all individual authenticity required a joining with the “transcendent other,” traditionally God, but which, in The Santaroga Barrier, is something else entirely, the communal identity, the Being.

The distinction between the outside world and the world of Santaroga is one of beings and Being. In Gilbert Dasein’s outside life, he is one of many beings, with individual needs and desires; in Santaroga, however, he tastes the Jaspers and begins to understand himself as part of something larger, as part of Being itself, the “transcendent other,” of Karl Jaspers. To boot, Gilbert Dasein himself is named after a term from Heidigger’s Sein und Zeit (Being and Time), in which we find a very Santarogan definition of existence: “‘Being’ is not something like a being… Being is what determines beings as beings, that in terms of which beings are already understood.”

NEXT BOOK: PHILIP K. DICK’S DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP?

Posted in Science | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The Ice People

IcePeople.jpg

The Ice People is a lesser-known French science fiction novel by René Barjavel. In French, it is known by the more nuanced title, La Nuit Des Temps (the Night of Time). I chose it primarily because I was bewitched by the cover design and the promise of its Frenchness.

Incidentally, I really like the quiet nationalism of science fiction books penned by authors from smaller countries. In the work of Karel Capek, Czechoslovakia is a major player on the global scene; in Fred Hoyle and early Arthur C. Clarke, the British control the military-industrial complex; in Berjavel, the French helm massive scientific expeditions, and scientists, frustrated by the lag in their simultaneous translation devices, resort to a global tongue, French, in their most passionate moments. Of course, when you can invent ancient Lost Worlds and English-speaking Newts, why not throw in a little fantasy about national politics? One for the home team? After all, isn’t that what science fiction is all about? Boosting the ultimate home team — Earth?

Unsurprisingly, then, this novel has an impressive cult following in France: people sport tattoos of mystic mathematical symbols from The Ice People and collect insciptions and autographs from the author — there are even Berjavel Days in his hometown of Nyons.

I found out after reading The Ice People that René Berjavel was the first author to ponder the grandfather paradox of time travel. There is nothing altogether surprising about this, as The Ice People tells two parallel stories: of a lost civilization, some 9,000 years old, and of the present-day world, struggling to deal with this recently-discovered past. Here’s the lowdown: a posse of Antarctic scientists discover the ruins of an inconceivably ancient city below the ice. When they journey to exhume it, they find it’s pretty much disintegrated over time; however, they do unearth a massive golden sphere beneath the city, packed in a pocket of sand and rock, which seems to have been built to last. The sphere and the city are 9,000 years old, and indicate a complex, technologically sophisticated human society at its peak during a time that modern scientists thought was the province of monkeys, not men. Everyone struggles with the notion.

Inside the sphere are two people, cryogenically frozen, ready to be resuscitated. A man and a woman, obviously; the scientists decide to wake the woman first. She wakes up believing she has only slept a night, only to discover that eons have passed, everyone she loves is dead, and no one speaks her language. In this sense the novel is as much a belletristic love story cloaked with Romeo and Juliet-level tragedy as it is a thought experiment in science fiction. There is a part of me that privileges the thought experiment over the romance, perhaps as an overcompensation for being a female reader of a traditionally male genre, but I cannot deny the compelling dimension of this element of the story. Everything and everyone in the lost, 9,000 year-old human world was annihilated by world war, the planet destroyed beyond recognition, and this woman was forced against her will to represent the species in a future time! And her love, her man, made her do it so that she could live, even though he would die! And now she’s naked, hungry, in a makeshift hospital in the Antarctic surrounded by jabbering men who want her to explain the prodigious scientific achievements of her people! And nothing has really changed in the human psyche, after all, as the world greedily clambers for war over the “Ice People!”

And what can we expect to happen next, really, but another nuclear war?

We’re expected to learn from this; or rather, we are expected to shamefully hang our heads and think, “we will never learn.” We are also supposed to be empowered by the selflessness of true love. These two hackneyed messages, about the eternal fuckedupness of the human race and the power of eternal love, are so mainstream (and contradictory) as to be actually surprising.

Which makes The Ice People radically boring, or boringly radical.

NEXT BOOK: FRANK HERBERT’S THE SANTAROGA BARRIER

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

A Friendly Reminder

scifi.jpg

Posted in Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Quark #1

QUARK.jpg

As far as science fiction anthologies go, Quark #1 is weird. Co-edited in the early 70s by the poet Marilyn Hacker and Samuel Delany (who were married at the time, but have long since separated and both self-identified as homosexual), it purports to be an quarterly of “speculative fiction,” an all-encompassing buzzword for outsider literature that was particularly in vogue at the time. Perhaps as a result, the first book in the series (of four) is both utopian and vague, full of middle-ground short stories that either couldn’t or wouldn’t hack it as pure science fiction. Familiar names are there — Ursula K. LeGuin, A.E. Van Vogt — but they’re all flubbing a little, trying out different styles. It’s often funny, and certainly worth seeking out, but the real highlight of Quark #1 is an essay from Samuel Delany, who tries nobly to place “speculative fiction” into a larger historical context.

In the spirit of open sourcery, and because I love it when other sites do this, I’ve scanned Delany’s article and PDF’ed it for anyone interested. This is a relatively hard-to-find essay, and a quick read to boot. The brunt of the piece has to do with the largely unspoken similarities between science fiction and poetry; in Delany’s argument, both genres have an incantatory function, in that they are both preoccupied with conjuring up the “thingness” of things.

An interesting aside: science fiction is the most fertile area of writing in the production of new words — a position held, up until the mid-1930s, by poetry. Coincidence?

Download: Samuel Delany, Critical Methods: Speculative Fiction (1.3 MB)

NEXT BOOK: RENÉ BERJAVEL’S THE ICE PEOPLE

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

War With The Newts

WarWithTheNewts.jpg

SpaceCanon: I wanted to talk to you about War with the Newts
Evan: Oh yea! I love that book
SpaceCanon: yeah man me too
Evan: In addition to many other things, I feel like it is the missing link between modern science fiction and like Frankenstein and Dracula
SpaceCanon: it’s so tenuously “science fiction”
SpaceCanon: actually very little science
SpaceCanon: and it doesn’t feel like fiction either
Evan: like, the epistolary structure
Evan: is that the right word?
SpaceCanon: I’m not sure
Evan: its letters
SpaceCanon: oh, you mean the fragented, modernist narration?
Evan: yup
SpaceCanon: it’s like the Wasteland of sci fi books
Evan: but people remember it being this weird prophetic thing about nazism
Evan: and not much else
Evan: but i think it really is a major thing
SpaceCanon: I read that Karel Capek “died of a broken heart” shortly after he wrote it
SpaceCanon: when he realized how fucked czechoslovakia was going to be
Evan: that is crazy

NEXT BOOK: QUARK #1

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments