Blog Redesign

OMNI1.jpg

Hello readers, and welcome to a very significant redesign of this nascent blog.

For those of you who don’t collect science magazines from the mid-80s, the new Space Canon design is a serious homage to OMNI, a seminal publication that ran from the late 1970s to the mid-90s. OMNI was a science magazine, but it didn’t draw heavy lines in the dirt: it ran stories from the likes of William Gibson and Orson Scott Card, as well as gonzo interviews with visionary scientists and thinkers, and, in later, years, deep features on fringe science and the paranormal.

OMNI2.jpg

Fun fact about OMNI: turn the magazine on its side, and the print reads O, 3, 2, 1.

Big thanks to Jona Bechtolt for making this dream a reality.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

JEM

Jem.jpg

JEM, a limerick:

There once was a planet named Jem,
Which seemed to accommodate men,
With Earth torn asunder,
By one nuclear blunder,
Humankind thought to try it again.

JEM, a haiku:

Dim red sun overhead,
Sad beasts of the sky and earth.
Humans, welcome home.

JEM, a sonnet:

In the air float sentient balloons,
Not unlike a wet dream of Carl Sagan’s;
The mist blocks out the sight of the moons,
no God, all of us have turned pagan.

Sun flares, no day, no sign from home, alone,
In night, our small outpost, its cries fall mute
upon the sour and acrid hives of bone
and carapace and guns and combat boots.

Hopes were set forth for a crimson utopia.
Arrived on Jem we saw ourselves turn cruel,
our love for war became myopia.
What comedy to name this place a jewel.

Adventures of men will end in disaster,
in space, repeat chorus: to death, our old master.

NEXT BOOK: KAREL CAPEK, WAR WITH THE NEWTS

Posted in Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Nebula Award Stories Four

NebulaStoriesFour.jpg

The first and most egregious mistake I made when I sat down to determine the guidelines of this project was to forget about short stories. By populating my reading list exclusively with novels, I flouted the genre’s most sacred form. The cultural heart of science fiction is in short-form pieces, due to its longstanding relationship with magazine publishing: stories, novellas, and serialized novels are the bread and butter of the magazines that have kept the community together for decades. Between the 1920s and 1950s, American science fiction magazines were basically the only place one could easily find written science fiction — which, of course, means that some of the most important pieces in the history of the genre are short-format, and first saw the light of day in a mimeographed fanzine or a copy of Amazing Stories.

So, true to the flexible spirit of this project, I am amending the list: short stories are now fair game. Obviously.

Of course, since science fiction publications are frequent and many, and readers as varied in taste as you could imagine about a lot introspective escapists, there’s wheat to separate from the chaff. Short story collections vary from the extraordinarily pulpy (a recent acquisition is proof: a paperback of SPACED OUT, the third in Michel Parry’s series of drug-themed SF romps, warns its readers not to read it unless they’re into “monstro freak-outs”) to the literary and respectable, with every conceivable diversion in between. None is particularly privileged to the title of “real” science fiction, because they all represent different facets of a highly diverse culture, and I’ll try to read as much paperback pulp as I do Nebula winners.

That said, my first short stories of this project are from a collection of 1968 Nebula award winners, the fourth year of the award’s existence. It represents a decent range of what was going on at the time — an excerpt from Anne McCaffrey’s Dragonrider, Richard Wilson’s post-apocalyptic Mother To The World, and a Kate Wilhelm story called The Planners, about monkey researchers. It also includes a handful of shorter stories — “as many runners-up as could be fitted in.”

A confession: I gave up on Dragonrider three pages in, since it made little sense without the other parts of the story, and was so drenched in Fantasy-style neologisms (“Weyrleader,” “F’lar,” “Ruatha”) that it made my head spin. I promise I will read the book, since it’s on the list, but I do not have a good feeling about it.

All of the stories were good, or at least up to the standards one would imagine the SFWA upholds for the Nebula awards, especially this early the game, but my favorite was a runner-up, a really short piece by Terry Carr called The Dance of the Changer And The Three, which is a kind of sociological study of a mythic poem told by an alien race of energy beings barely classifiable as life-forms by our standards. It was wonderful because it expressed the blank horror of the truly alien, the total other; even though these beings are beautiful, and communicate through color, movement, and radiation of energy, their most important and venerable sagas seem mystifyingly irrelevant to the human psyche. The saga in question is a brilliant invention: Carr manages to come up with an alien epic that sounds fragile, strange, and brutishly translated. The man charged with communicating with these creatures, and perhaps the only man to manage to translate their movements into language, is baffled to the point of exasperation by their stories:

And these are the creatures with whom I had to deal and whose rights I was charged to protect. I was ambassador to a planetful of things that would tell me with a straight face that two and two are orange.

I don’t want to give away the great ending, because I found The Dance of the Changer And The Three online, available to read for free right here. It’s well worth the 25 minutes you’ll spend reading it, which is, I suppose, one of the primary benefits of short stories — they require very little of your time in relation to how much they can make you think.

NEXT BOOK: FREDERIK POHL’S JEM.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Stranger In A Strange Land

StrangerInAStrangeLand.jpg

Stranger in a Strange Land is a classic of early 1960s American science fiction, and a game-changer for the genre’s sexual politics, so long relegated to a weird ghetto of three-breasted Martian babes and earnest blondes defiled by tentacled monsters. It’s hard to overestimate this book’s influence: it was the catalyst for a neopagan religion, was adopted as a kind of manifesto for 60s counterculture, spawned a few neologisms, and accurately predicted the moral and religious trends of the decades to come, namely the birth of the evangelical corporate megachurch. It also, apparently, includes the first description of the waterbed, which did not yet exist in 1961.

As a side note, I’ve often read that Robert Heinlein is part of the holy trinity (“The Big Three”) of popular sci-fi authors, along with Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asmiov, a commendation that I find, post-Foundation, to be absolutely ridiculous. Yes, he’s as wry with his social commentary as any sci-fi great should be, but he’s so obviously better, and patently sexier, than Asimov, who is a grand old bore, or Clarke, who has a nefarious tendency to keep the juicy stuff to his personal life. Of course, this is based on the reading of just one novel, one which made Heinlein an unlikely pied piper of hippie liberalism, when in reality his own views on the subject, although much-scrutinized, are definitely unclear, especially since he penned Starship Troopers, considered by many to be a fundamentally conservative novel, around the same time.

Anyway, the “stranger” of the title is actually a human man, and the “strange land” is Earth: not exactly an epic set-up for a book proclaimed to be, according to the cover of my edition, “the greatest science fiction fantasy of all time.” However, the man in question is Valentine Michael Smith, an orphaned human raised on Mars, by Martians, and returned to Earth in his mid-20s with all the psychic wisdom of his Martian forebears and absolutely no clue about human society, language, or mores — a kind of infant superman. Through the eyes of a creature who is biologically but not psychologically human, we see our most hallowed institutions — religion, money, monogamy, and the fear of death — as they perhaps really are, which is to say, absurd. His ignorance is almost psychedelic: he takes rapturous, baffled joy in swimming pools, considering the practice of bathing in water to be a religious experience of high merit. Mike is, culturally, a blank slate, but with his typically Martian sincerity, not to mention his abilities (telepathy, telekinesis, and the willing “discorporation” of self and enemies), he wields a strangely mystical authority, giving Heinlein a quasi-legitimate voice for guilt-free hippie grandstanding. With his combination of loving sincerity and transcendent force, the Martian named Smith “preaches” a universal message of spiritual polygamy, cosmic patience, non-mainstream family structures, and social libertarianism. Without the aura of outer space, he could just as easily be a religious messiah. In truth, he becomes one, and singlehandedly rewrites history.

Stranger is a lovely, powerful book, one which has no illusions about its intentions (broad, clever satire) nor a lick of self-consciousness: Heinlein, through the mouthpiece of Mike and other characters, namely Jubal Harshaw, a curmudgeonly bon-vivant with an appetite for long-winded speeches on everything from Rodin to cannibalism, lambasts his chosen targets without prudishness, and with commendable intellectual zeal. Sure, there’s some arguable stuff, like a brief, confused foray into homophobia and old-fashioned sexist patronizing, but it mostly reflects the time and the hesitant puritanism of some of the novels’ characters; surely, compared to most science fiction books dating from the early sixties, Heinlein is practically Betty Freidan.

On the whole, I found Stranger In A Strange Land both funny and thought-provoking, and in a way, reading it is like going back to the fountainhead of decades of liberal thought, making hippie counterculture seem fresh again — it did more to revise my opinions on polyamory than the entire “free love” movement. Of course, I’m not about to run off and join the Church Of All Worlds yet, but we would certainly not be remiss in adopting the worldview of Valentine Michael Smith, at least occasionally. In fact, it could be a formidable exercise for us all to wake up in the morning and approach everything in the world as a powerful Martian might: with sincerity, fascination, and one finger solidly squared on the “annihilate” button.

NEXT BOOK: NEBULA AWARD STORIES FOUR.

Posted in Science | 4 Comments

Foundation Trilogy: Book One

FoundationTrilogy.jpg

Foundation is a trilogy of Isaac Asimov novels that was honored with a special Hugo award for “Best All-Time” series. It beat out some heavy hitters for the title, including Lord of the Rings. After reading the first book of the trilogy, I can understand the semantics that make this award relevant: it’s, like, the Best series about All Time, not the Best Series of All Time.

That’s a joke. See, Foundation takes place on a massive time scale, chronicling the rise of a civilization over the course of centuries. No characters are around for long, as the story outlives them all.

The premise: a great psycho-historian named Hari Seldon uses a mixture of statistics and sociology to predict the fall of the Galactic empire. To prevent the inevitable eons of barbarism between this drama and the rise of the next great civilization, he sets up a couple of insurance policies for humanity: two isolated planet-colonies stocked with all the available knowledge of art, science, and technology. The primary colony, Terminus, is destined to become the seat of the next empire, and Seldon plots out its entire political future on a long-distance time scale peppered with so-called Seldon Crises, moments at which necessary and unavoidable political actions change the course of history.

The first book in the ludicrously expansive Foundation series takes us from the time of Hari Seldon to about 200 years of Terminus’ history, beginning with scientists and encyclopedists, and finishing with merchant-princes and traders. It heralds the beginning of its own empire, the profitable novel series, which spawned some nine sequels and prequels, not all penned by Asimov, over the course of half a century. The books are evidently much-beloved, and I would be loath to dismiss them, particularly as there isn’t anything especially offensive about them. I generally love books that span such huge time scales; Olaf Stapledon’s Last and First Men, obviously an influence here, and Frank Herbert’s Dune, which probably cribs a little from Foundation, both come to mind. Still, there is something remiss about this one: Asimov’s style is so dry and concise that it lacks, to me, the pathos of such a generational story. Knowing the premise, I expected the sweat and tears of an entire race to parade before me, to witness the triumph of knowledge over savagery, some really epic, opening-ceremony-of-the-Olympics sort of stuff. Instead, it’s men making plans, men making deals with other men, just another oligarchy in outer space.

Am I the only person to be disappointed by this? Given the freeing lack of constraints presented by science fiction, I was surprised to find intergalactic rulers in a universe millennia in the future doing business as usual, screwing each other out of resources and comparing the sizes of their atomic weapons like it’s the Cold War. I think Foundation is supposed to be uplifting — humanity, so strong, rebuilding itself through science — but it comes off as a dry extrapolation of the present on a bigger scale. It’s a novel about political machinations that wouldn’t be out of place in United Nations back rooms, but seem pedestrian and silly in the context of a galactic empire.

Hence this joke, an alternate title for Isaac Asimov’s Foundation: White Men Make Up History.

NEXT BOOK: EITHER BOOK TWO OF FOUNDATION OR ROBERT A. HEINLEIN’S STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Invisible Man

The Invisible Man is a fine modern tragedy.

In it Griffin, a young optical physicist, in an ill-timed fit of desperation stemming from his hope for scientific recognition and his inability to cope with people, renders himself invisible. He does this by lowering the refractive index of his body, bleaching his blood, and undergoing a painful and undefined process. His invisibility is total, but it is also a product of science, not magic, and hence is incredibly literal. Undigested food remains visible in Griffin’s body, appearing as a floating murk in the air. The snow and dirt settling on his shoulders make his outline visible again, and he can only be invisible while naked, as clothes cloak his form. The reality of his trick is brutal: naked, cold, terrified of leaving a trace anywhere, Griffin cowers in the streets of London, homeless and totally alone. He is driven mad by the irreversibility of his predicament.

While other writers of his time might have made The Invisible Man into an adventure story, a slapstick romp of illusion, H.G. Wells saw a life of invisibility as it really might be. To be invisible is to be completely cast away from the most fundamental, underlying commonalities between all people: being, onus, and self. Griffin is, by virtue of being unseen, no longer human. And, faced with the hysterical reaction of regular folk to his predicament, he certainly acts accordingly: stealing, verbally abusing people, using fear to overpower the weak, and, near the end, dreaming of a reign of terror, of murder.

In the preface to my edition, George P. Wells (H.G’s son), details the scientifically burgeoning era of his father’s writing. After all, the late 1880s saw the invention of the lightbulb, the radio, the automobile; people could light and heat their homes at the touch of a button, all things that might have seemed like magical fantasies a few decades previous, and things which probably retained a little aura of the magical for many people. There really was a sense of unabashed optimism about science, about technology’s potential to unveil new comforts and wonders for the everyman. Still, Wells saw the darkness. His son writes, “the scientific worker strives continually to give man a greater power to shape his destiny; the individual finds more and more than he holds the power of life over death, only as a power of death over life.” Yikes.

“Why,” said Huxter suddenly, “that’s not a man at all. It’s just empty clothes. Look! You can see down his collar and the linings of his clothes. I could put my arm –“

It’s exactly these kind of juxtapositions — between the commoner and the physicist, the glowing promise of science and its hard-edged underbelly — though, that makes The Invisible Man so potent. Like all of Wells’ early novels, it’s set in the most brass-tacks landscape possible: a provincial England, populated by innkeepers and constables, ordinary folk, gossiping amongst one another as they experience the extraordinary. Wells uses specific, dry language, and it’s a particularity of his style that when he shows us the unbelievable, it’s through the unbelieving eyes of a common bystander (“No ‘ed, I tell ye!”), whose attempts to remain objective in the face of unimaginable horror make the events far more chilling. I can’t help but think of Clarke’s third law: any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. And magic has no being, like an invisible man.

NEXT BOOK: ISAAC ASIMOV’S FOUNDATION

Posted in Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Einstein Intersection

TEI.jpg

The Einstein Intersection takes place on an indeterminately future Earth: humanity is long gone, replaced by a genetically troubled race of people, largely mutants and idiots, living within the ruins of human society, struggling to make sense of abandoned technologies and enacting the remnants of our culture through exaggerated myths about the ancient heroes of Earth, such as the Beatles, Jean Harlow, and Elvis.

For example:

“You remember the legend of The Beatles? You remember the Beatle Ringo left his love even though she treated him tender. He was the one Beatle who did not sing, so the earliest forms of the legend go. After a hard day’s night he and the rest of the Beatles were torn apart by screaming girls, and he and the other Beatles returned, finally at one, with the great rock and the great roll.”

Incredible. Anyway, the central character is a kind of alien Orpheus, who sets out across the bombed-out world, defeating lush monsters and hanging out with psychics and Vikings, in order to rescue his love (an equally alien Eurydice) from Death. It’s a doomed mission from the start, and he unwittingly enacts, undoubtedly for the millionth time, the tragic archetypes of human mythology.

I’ve never read Samuel Delany before, although I’ve heard his work represents a substantial segment of the literary sci-fi canon. I can see why: The Einstein Intersection is lyrical, intricate, and peppered with self-consciously meta author’s notes that say things like, “you are twenty-one years old, going on twenty-two: you are old too get by as a child prodigy, your accomplishments are more important at the age at which they were done, still, the images of youth plague me, Chatterton, Greenburg, Radiguet.” And here, a book that is essentially a fantasy, about a musical troll trekking across a sumptuous planet on dragon-back, but the references — to the myth of Orpheus, Isidore Ducasse, Machievelli, and Yeats — are spot on, and you know that it’s all a kind of tragic allegory about love and myth. It’s Joyceain in its scope, and childlike in its approach to the redress of wrongs: tears, music, and disbelief in the face of evil.

This book is positioned strongly in a kind of academic, trans-genre critical position. It’s about mutants, but also: it’s not about mutants at all. Hence, this is my entrĂ©e into a new kind of science fiction. It seems to me that the ultimate enactment of the genre’s purpose is as a kind of subterfuge for academic freaks; since science fiction is ostensibly for outcasts, and is generally unread by the literary establishment, there is a safety blanket there, some room to get weird and still get published. At the same time, the primary demographic of science fiction is of the action-figure collecting persuasion, so the reaction to a book like The Einstein Intersection from traditional male geeks (i.e. Larry Niven fans) is one of terrified, shocked betrayal — of alienation from their own culture. Can you imagine? Coming across a science fiction book that looks like it’s going to be about talking dragons and mutant babes, but then finding out that it’s written by a gay, dyslexic black man with, like, a hand fetish and an obsession with classical mythology. Seriously, start browsing reviews online, and you will find pages and pages of virulent nerds damning Delany’s work.

Too deep for nerds, too weird for the traditional canon: it’s the real borderland.

Ray Davis, in a critical essay (Delany’s Dirt) about Delany’s later, slightly-pornographic books, writes, “…genres may assume reading protocols which are not those of a particular ideal of literature. But a given piece of fiction can fit more than one set of protocols, and the set of ‘literary’ protocols is notable for its flexibility.” Which is to say that the genre — science fiction, as it were — has a set of strict conventions, to the point that fans will become deeply betrayed when they aren’t adhered to, but genre-specific content like this can often tell us things that mainstream books, non-genre books, can’t. And the mantle of “literature” (flexible as it is) can float down, too, to grace the shoulders of the most unlikely books.

It’s kind of a Catch-22: to understand Delany, you have to be at least somewhat fannish, willing to let down your guard and accept that genre-specific content isn’t a sign of weakness. At the same time, you can’t be so committed to the genre that you would sell someone like Delany down the river for getting liberal with the rules.

NEXT BOOK: H.G. WELLS’ THE INVISIBLE MAN.

Posted in Science | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Ringworld

Ringworlds.jpg

Larry Niven’s Ringworld is the first book of the project that I have not liked. In fact, I disliked it so much that it shook the very foundation of my belief in science fiction as the greatest of all genres. All of a sudden: I was embarrassed. As I explained the plot to my friend (“So the cat-monster and the puppeteer are traveling across the planet in their flying motorcycles….”), I had trouble justifying the book as anything more than a glorified fantasy novel, a sexist, boring tromp through an admittedly cool universe. And here’s a book that won the golden accolades of the science fiction world: both the Hugo and Nebula awards!

To be fair, the titular Ringworld is a fantastic invention, although totally a Big Dumb Object: a massive wedge of Dyson sphere rotating around a distant star, made by a long-dead civilization with inconceivable energy needs and technological prowess. What remains of the society which built the Ring are pockets of hairy, tribal herds, who worship the massive Ring as a kind of holy arch, and remember nothing of the great engineers that are their ancestors, nor understand the sheer scale of their world. The future anterieur aspect of this is among my favorite SF tropes: the Ringwold’s history, as we discover it, is rich with poetic “will have been” moments. The civilzation which, from our perspective, is bafflingly advanced, has already fallen, become obsolete, become the distant past — a past not unlike our own present.

Still, a great science fiction novel can’t just rest on the crutches of a scientifically engaging premise, especially if it wants to stand up as something particularly literary for posterity. Ringworld takes place in Niven’s Known Space universe, a place where many alien civilizations have already made contact with humanity, and some of the novel’s main characters are aliens, ostensibly struggling to understand human social quirks, which is a neat excuse, I suppose, for the otherwise inexcusably flaccid dialogue. The human characters, especially the women — a clueless ingenue and a prostitute, respectively — are the pits, practically offensive, and a solid reminder that science fiction has long been a boy’s club. Maybe this is the root of my embarrassment regarding Ringworld: why would I waste my time with a book that is pointedly written for a subculture of male nerd-dom too deep for me to parse? This is literature for physics-obsessed young men who have never hung out with smart girls, or any girls for that matter, couldn’t sniff sexism if it bit them on the nose, and would much rather tabulate the obscure technical specifications of a fictional space object.

A particularly dark diss on Niven from a similarly minded Amazon.com book reviewer:
“Niven seems to reveal himself to be a sad, sexist nerd who had one solitary good idea and just really lucked out.”

In the end this is just Rendezvous With Rama-lite (although, yes, I know, Rama came later). Or, rather, this formula:

Rama + the Mos Eisley Cantina scene in Star Wars = Ringworld

NEXT BOOK: SAMUEL DELANY’S EINSTEIN INTERSECTION.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

The Internet Has Officially Blessed This Project

WinASFNovel.jpg

It’s been telling me via Google text ads.

Posted in Science | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Imperial Earth: A Poem

ImperialEarth.jpg

Impetuously, a space-living
Man, still young,
Plots his first and last journey to
Earth, for him, a
Return to his long-forgotten birthplace.
In the ship, he trains for
All those forgotten rituals, including:
Life with gravity.

Everything he finds, including the most anodyne of
Animals, seems mystical, meaningful, alien.
Returning to his home on the moon of
Titan, he is
Humbled.

NEXT BOOK: LARRY NIVEN’S RINGWORLD.

Posted in Science | Tagged , , | 2 Comments