I put up this old article from a ’98 VIBE on Ike Turner and it’s essential reading, for real. The writer, Anne Marlowe, examines how Ike was transformed in the public eye from semi-heralded musical genius into mythological “ultimate dangerous black male” almost singlehandedly by the cartoonified Tina biopic What’s Love Got to Do with it. Now, of course she doesn’t gloss over any of the parts where he actually was, indeed, abusive to Tina, because he was, and he was clearly a grade-a, hands-on misogynist. But she points out the double standards – how Elvis’s similar transgressions never get mentioned, and chronicles how his mythic-proportion public persona overshadowed and overwrote his place in music, as a national treasure. In the standard tradition of America’s music historians burying great black talents beneath their personal ills, of course – of holding black musicians to greater and more stringent personality litmus tests than their white counterparts. It’s what is happening to R Kelly, it’s what has happened to Michael Jackson, it’s what people tried to do with Mariah Carey. And with that, I leave you with my favorite non-Tina-related Ike Turner song, “Funky Mule,” which has the illest break I can think of – the bassline and the drums spar with the guitar in a singularly massive moment of, um, funkiness. When you listen to it your face will funky-mule right off. PS Who has sampled this track? Seems like something breaks freaks would go right in for.
Urban Honking
is a community of writers, visual artists, musicians, filmmakers, and other great humans.
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2014
- June 2013
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Categories
Meta
Separating the art from the artist is hard. I have a Modigliani print on my wall.
Or: Ike the Barry Bonds to Elvis’ Roger Clemens?
Ann Powers wrote a piece for the LA Times about how you can’t separate Ike Turner’s violence toward women from his music, etc. etc. One of my professors wrote in a rebuttal, in which he refers to Led Zeppelin as “baby rapers.” But yeah, exactly this point you’re making. Led Zeppelin gang rapes (literally!) women in hotel rooms, Vince Neil kills a bunch of people and throws prostitutes around by their throats, but it’s in IKE TURNER’S music that we can’t separate out the violence??????
All this talk about Ike Turner is freaking me out. Just the other day in my gym class we were listening to an 80’s best of CD and none other then “What’s Love Got To Do With It” came on. Not two days later I heard about Ike’s comeback and how that particular song was about his violence to Tina. I had no idea. I distinctly remember seeing the music video when I was probably 5 and wondered what standing in front of a chain link fence and huge hair had to do with love.