THAT IS ALL
Urban Honking
is a community of writers, visual artists, musicians, filmmakers, and other great humans.
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2014
- June 2013
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- June 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
Categories
Meta
Is this an ironic or semi-ironic post?
I hope it’s not ironic. It’s the best show [if only Deadwood didn’t tank this season!] HBO’s ever produced; I say this as someone who first believed that the show’s surveillance fetish amounted to police pornography. Turns out they were really prescient to what was coming next for the U.S.
[In fact, it reminded me to buy the 3rd season for my wife’s birthday this weekend! Public service!]
I resent even having to answer “ironic or semi-ironic”, but no, there is nothing ironic about this post. The Wire is the best-written, -acted and -produced show on television.
does it get better after the first episode? didn’t seem so well acted or written at that point…
Now that they’re tackling Baltimore’s deeply cynical BELIEVE campaign of smoke and mirrors, I’d say that it’s much better than the first season.
The writers are both clued in to trends in urban political economy and governance, hate police procedurals and are treating Baltimore the way the neo-Realists treated Italy.
I did not mean to impose upon you the “ironic” or “semi-ironic” imposition, though I recognize that is exactly what my comment does.
I thought the first season was really bad. It turned me off to the whole series. However, I absolutely trust your judgment, and based on other comments it looks subsequent seasons have improved.
Sorry for being a jerk. The first season was just really bad.
i got netflix for 2 weeks just for this… i watched it all in one day.
my life feels more complete now
i got netflix for 2 weeks just for this… i watched it all in one day.
my life feels more complete now
i watched a couple episodes of this once, didn’t really feel it at all. the production values seemed more like 2nd-tier pbs station than hbo, and some of the characters (especially the cops) were just really boring. season one of the muppet show, on the other hand…now that’s entertainment. who knew rita moreno used to be so hot?
for some reason i haven’t been here in a long time. the respite is over.
The first season was BAD? wtf are you on.
Maybe it didn’t have enough ‘branding’ for you, Andrew.
And maybe you just get off on really easy stereotypes like an Irish cop who drinks too much and a black drug dealer with a heart of gold, David.
OOH!!! FIGHTING WORDS. THIS IS WHY YOU HAVE TO WATCH BEYOND EPISODE ONE BEFORE YOU MAKE JUDGEMENT CALLS.
The drinking Irish cop, McNulty, is joined by his black partner, Freeman, in drinking too much; in fact, in an episode late in season one, during a funeral, Freeman leads the charge in singing along to a song by real-life Irish drunkards The Pogues (a song, incidentally, which real Baltimore cops traditionally sing in memory of their fallen brethren). But let’s not mince racial non-stereotypes — sure there are a few (black and white) drug dealers with hearts of gold on the wire but they’re also, you know, *drug dealers* and murderers, too — and the cops are all sheisty and political — all of which provides the moral grey area that is the show’s real forte. No one character is without flaw; everyone is fucked because the system is fucked. That’s the beauty of the show: they deliberately portray the parallels between two corrupt structures (the police department and the drug game) trying to coexist in an inherently lethal environment (Baltimore). No one can win (least of all the players with flecks of gold in their hearts). It’s like fucking Sartre up in here.
And more importantly, it’s created by a former Baltimore cop and a drug-beat reporter from the Baltimore Sun, who compiled their decades-long experience into three seasons of mind-blowingly mind-blowing script. Every character is either based on, or a composite of, real people and situations. (There was a real drug lord in the ’80s in Bmore by the name of Barksdale.) And where they felt they couldn’t do the plots justice, they simply employed writers like GEORGE FUCKING PELECANOS and RICHARD PRICE TO HELP THE NARRATIVE ALONG. I know this because everyone I know who has watched more than three-five episodes is completely obsessed with the program and we talk about it at length (most of us are writers). That and I have watched the director’s commentary for many, many episodes.
Seriously. You have to watch it some more.
Personally, it doesn’t matter to me whether or not these characters are based on “real people” and “real situations.” The question I would ask is, “Why is this story being told?” and why is it being told from the perspective it is being told from.
Do we really need another show told from the perspective of law enforcement (no matter how flawed the main character is)? You can make the argument that it is a story not actually told from McNulty’s perspective, but after watching the entirety of Season 1, I have to say that I got a very paternalistic, white man trying to understand the plight of the poor black man, vibe.
And what about the Jewiest of Jewy defense attorney, who is also a despicable character?
Certainly there are “real people” who are shitty Jewish defense attorneys, and alcoholic Irish cops, and black drug dealers, and I am not opposed to these characters existing in some context. I don’t think a show told (yet again) from the perspective of law enforcement (no matter how liberal-minded and supposedly progressive the depiction is) is the most exciting context.
And, I will only add that I was responding to the snide comment by “David,” and genuinely trust your judgment on these matters, especially as I have not seen seasons 2 or 3 (the latter being what your initial post was actually about).
Well if you don’t like Season 1 and have actually seen it past the first episode (which I’m really doubting based on yr take that the characters are 1-dimensional stereotypes) then you’re not going to like seasons 2 or 3 either.
This show is definitely telling more than any program I have ever seen on television, and with more depth and insight than any normal ‘cop drama,’ even more so than the (almost as great) Homicide series from the early 90s. It takes a very subversive look at the cops-n-robbers cliches, but more importantly is telling stories that haven’t been told.
What are you looking for here exactly? That a show about the baltimore drug trade NOT include black drug dealers and irish cops? There’s a thin line between playing into stereotypes and presenting a near-accurate and very very REAL alternate reality, and the Wire is firmly on one side of that line.
To reiterate, not “how” the story is told, but “why” and “by whom.”
No matter how ostensibly real a particular cop drama is, all cop dramas serve the same function, by firmly placing in the spectator in a position of empowerment and authority over the fucked up criminal shit that “happens” every day on the news.
Maybe this isn’t a bad thing. But I increasingly feel that shows like this use “realism” merely to assuage the guilt of liberal-minded progressives like you and me, over indulging in this particular fantasy of authority over underprivileged and minority groups.
What would I be more interested in? Perhaps a show written by a former drug dealer about the banality of his actual life. I actually don’t know what he would write about, because, well, we never see that show on television, do we?
I am really just surprised by the interest in the show, especially amongst those who support hip-hop, because I basically see those two things (The Wire, Hip-Hop) as being part of two very different projects.
But that is just my opinion.
And yes I did see the whole of season 1. I like what you say about “telling stories that haven’t been told,” obviously, but the cliches (and even the pseudo-subversive looks at the cliches) just seem unnecessary to me.
I’m still not following you, because it DOES follow the drug dealers, it never implies some sort of “right answer” nor does it give total control to the cops, and if anything its a depressed and angry and bitter program. I dont see how its about ‘indulging in [a] fantasy of authority over … minority groups.’ Its like you’re watching a different show entirely.
If anything it constantly challenges my assumptions, never assauges my ‘guilt’ but frequently upends my expectations of how characters will act in a given situation.