http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/ Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:51:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1563 Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:59:50 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1563 Well, I know you think so. I thought it ruled well, but was a little too stinging nettle and strawberry for me. Better than this year’s but too ‘uni directional’ to be perfect. I speak only for myself. Alex?

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1562 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:53:46 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1562 You do know (never minds agreement!) that last year’s was their best ever, right?

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1561 Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:49:15 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1561 perhaps an Esconditite?
Escondidorianistas unite!

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1560 Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:44:26 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/hotknives/2007/10/10/stones_11th/#comment-1560 I think it is Escondidoan. My friend would never call himself an Esconditan.

]]>