WORMHOLES
I feel like this is a bigger deal than just some Collgehumor video.
Electronic Tattoo Display runs on Blood
Remember getting your mind really blown by new technology?
Clive Thompson on Science Fiction
"If you want to read books that tackle profound philosophical questions, then the best — and perhaps only — place to turn these days is sci-fi. Science fiction is the last great literature of ideas."
Have you ever wondered what space smells like? Yeah, me neither.
NASA beams the Beatles into space
NASA broadcast "Across The Universe" into outer space using the Deep Space Network. Asked to comment, Paul McCartney wisely noted, "Amazing! Well done, NASA! Send my love to the aliens."
The Environmentally Non-Disturbing Under-ice Robotic Antarctic Explorer (ENDURANCE) is a $2.3 million project funded by NASA's Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets Program. It's autonomous underwater vehicle designed to swim untethered under ice, creating three-dimensional maps of underwater environments, and ostensibly is a test for exploring Europa, the icy Jovian moon that just might harbor life.
The Archive of Scientists' Transcendent Experiences: as amazing as it sounds.
Literally!
I love it when the New York Times gets all tripped out on science stuff.
Hugest Black Hole Ever Discovered
18 billion times the size of our sun!
LATEST POSTS
Happy Valentine's Day From Universe
Book Review: A Cosmic Samizdat
What's Going On With the Universe?
Evacuate Myspace Before It Recycles
Heaven's Gate: The Interplanetary Internet
CATEGORIES
animal life (3)
earth life (18)
human life (25)
Mathematics Life (1)
outer space life (23)
sea life (2)
skullface life (6)
technology life (6)
UNIVERSE ARCHIVED
February 2008 (2)
January 2008 (1)
December 2007 (4)
November 2007 (2)
October 2007 (2)
September 2007 (4)
August 2007 (3)
June 2007 (2)
May 2007 (3)
April 2007 (3)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (3)
January 2007 (7)
December 2006 (1)
November 2006 (2)
October 2006 (3)
September 2006 (3)
August 2006 (4)
July 2006 (6)
June 2006 (3)
May 2006 (3)
April 2006 (3)
March 2006 (3)
February 2006 (4)
January 2006 (6)
December 2005 (5)
Synergetic Earth Language
Archived From July 21, 2006

Every day, under our noses, obsolete scientific ideas run rampant. I'm not talking about the maddening sabotage of science constantly perpetuated by ideological conservatives -- that, although a daily frustration, is not unnoticed. This is a transgression that we all unknowingly commit.
Although everyone with a first-grade education knows that the Earth is a sphere -- the general belief in a flat Earth died out, of course, in the Middle Ages -- we still use the term "worldwide" to describe things on a global scale. The Earth's dimensions can be measured in volume, for one, and area; the word "wide," however, describes a proportion -- width -- that we have known for centuries that our planet doesn't have. Moreover, our use of the words "sunrise" and "sunset" stems from a long-outdated pre-Copernican model of the cosmos, one which places the Earth at the center of the sun's revolutions. Of course, the sun doesn't rise or set: rather, it is our position relative to it which defines how it appears to move on the horizon. We've known this since fancy horse-war times, and yet we continue to reiterate an archaic version of the human world-view in our anachronistic everyday language. Since most modern words are intuitive (automobile, for example, is pretty self-evident), lending the English language a false appearance of clarity, deeply-engrained use of obsolete terms can only result in a misunderstanding of the world.
The visionary American architect Buckminster Fuller (who, among other utopian achievements, invented the geodesic dome) argued that the unthinking use of these kinds of terms detracts from and misleads intuition -- if the words we use to describe concepts are counterintuitive, then our understanding of the reality of these concepts is weakened. Hell-bent on the debunking of phrases like "wordwide," "sunset," and "sunrise," Fuller proposed more truthful, albeit strange, analogues: "worldaround," "sunsight," and "sunclipse," respectively. Sure, it sounds silly, but language is a porous and ever-changing thing that can easily adapt to a culture's changing needs; "blog" wasn't even a word, let alone a concept, until a few years ago.

Fuller's involvement in shattering long-held conceptions didn't stop with "sunclipse," however. Frustrated with the inaccuracy of world maps -- how they sacrifice the relative size of countries in the process of representing a sphere (as we established earlier, the Earth is not flat) on a two-dimensional plane -- he set out to create a world map which wouldn't prolong cultural bias. Traditional maps, still in use, attempt to fit the world's curved surface onto a flat sheet, thus distorting its true layout. Areas far from the equator, for example, are generally distorted or exaggerated in size; on many maps, Greenland is presented as being roughly as large as Africa, when in fact Africa's area is approximately 13 times that of Greenland. That doesn't do much for Africa's status in our cultural consciousness.
Further, almost all maps place North at the top and South at the bottom, implicitly privileging the Northern countries as being somehow superior. These psychological implications are subtle, of course, but we must remember that the division between North and South is pretty arbitrary on a sphere floating through space. There's no up, no down, in the long haul.
I know that I'm always harping on this. However, we have the misfortune of living in the most severely polarized era of planet Earth. Fuller, in his essential text, Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth, wrote that "despite our recently developed communications intimacy and popular awareness of total Earth we...are as yet politically organized entirely in the terms of exclusive and utterly obsolete sovereign separateness." He wrote that in 1969; our country has only become more an more of an ideological island in the years since.
Incidentally, that first Appollo 8 image of the Earth from space was titled "Earthrise," which goes to show that scientific neologisms can be beautiful and worthy of adoption.
Bucky Fuller called us residents of "Spaceship Earth," fervently espoused this planet's synergetics, and designed his world map accordingly. The Dymaxion map (short for Dynamic Maximum Tension, a hybridized word applied to many Fuller structures) projects the global sphere onto the surface of a polyhedron, which is then unfolded in many different permutations and flattened to form a two-dimensional map. Sounds counterintuitive, but the Dymaxion map retains more of the planet's relative proportional integrity than any other global map. There is no right way to look at one of these maps, and no North or South to speak of. If you peel the triangular faces of the shape apart in one way, it reveals a view of an almost contiguous giant land mass including all of Earth's continents, as opposed to the groups of continents divided by oceans that we are accustomed to. If you configure the map differently, however, you can come to a view of the world dominated by connected oceans.

There is no correct way to view a Dymaxion map simply because there is no correct way to view our planet. All of the rules we impose on our world-view -- those barriers of incorrect language, the geometric divisions of border whose relevance we so often ignore -- are as arbitrary as a flat-Earth map. The first step towards rectifying these gross global fallacies is to recognize the effect that they have on our understanding. With that kind of lucidity in tow, human beings are pretty much unstoppable; we made up the rules, and we are perfectly capable of changing them. Why not change the way we speak, or the way we represent our planet to ourselves?
<< | Posted on July 21, 2006 at 5:47 PM | >>
Comments (4):
Hi there. Do you know where one could get a copy of a Dymaxion map? I just looked online and on amazon but all they seemed to have were exerpts from books referencing it or descriptions of what it is. I would really like to have one and start seeing the world in that manner.
Posted by Starr @ July 24, 2006 10:36 AM
Great! The Buckminster Fuller Institute has a good selection of fancy Dymaxion maps and globes.
Posted by Claire @ July 24, 2006 10:45 AM
This essay lingers lovingly among some of my favorite Fullerisms. The meme of an infinite, planar earth must be one of history's most toxic gifts. Bucky's call to stoke a new, spherical imagination with fresh and spatially accurate language ought to give important, steady work to a hundred million contemporary poets to let the air out of beguiling old terms like 'edge' and 'center'.
I drove to Portland from Seattle yesterday. (Yes, and back. What is that, 80 pounds of Carbon? Yes, part of the Problem; not all Solution. That's me.) I started to dream in neologisms. It happens, especially on a three-hour drive. Words were spinning through my mind like cogs, or the wheels of a slot machine. Chunk-chunk-chunk. Then fitting together in unexpected combinations, sometimes mapping just-so to the nervous motions of active but emptily un-named thought-space. I'm male and therefore hostage hormonally to an erotic tendency toward mechanistic jargon. This is all apology for this phrase that fell out of my head: contemporary contours of geographical determinism. Let's call it 'CC.Geo-D'ism', for short. (. . . and, sexy!).
Geo-D'ism, seems to describe that quality of discourse that reveals itself in phrases like: "Portland is so cool." and "That could never happen in Seattle." It's about mapping social attributes to large-scale spaces. Or, maybe it's about the ripples and social consequences that follow from the encoding and decoding required of map production. Northwest of what? Mid-East? Says who?
Rewrite, recompile, for the now feelings. People feel the small sphere in their bones now, like a homing instinct, even as all those men offer obsolete rhetoric from institutions founded on obsolete rhetoric.
Posted by Rich Jensen @ August 1, 2006 1:35 AM
this entry is filled with linguistic awesomness. Everything from the double entendre of world views and world-views to posting about the wideness of the world on nothing other than this web. www. claire, you rule.
Posted by flint @ July 21, 2006 10:14 PM