WORMHOLES
Reason #145 I want to go to MIT
An MIT team has designed a sleek spacesuit that relies on mechanical counter-pressure instead of using gas pressurization.
A bold new book tackles the ultimate thought experiment: what if there were no humans left?
Walter Haut, the now-deceased former PR representative at the Roswell Air Force base, issued an affadavit to be opened after his death, the text of which has just been released. It concludes: "I am convinced that what I personally observed was some kind of craft and its crew from outer space".
"We're kind of a big deal"
Giant Penguins Once Roamed the Earth
Researchers report in this week's online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that they have found remains of two types of penguin in Peru that date to 40 million years ago. One of them was a 5-foot giant with a long sharp beak.
The Robotarium X in Jardim Central, Portugal, is the first zoo for artificial life. It houses a revolving cast of creatures powered by photovoltaic energy. Unlike with a real zoo, the Robotarium is the ideal environment for its residents, with plenty of sun, smoothness, tranquility and attention. There are no fights or aggression and the only competition is to assure a place under the sunlight.
Lake Dissapears in Central Chile
One casual theory is that an earthquake opened up a fissure in the ground, allowing the lake's water to drain through.
Bacteria Could Help Steady Buildings
Soil bacteria could be used to help steady buildings against earthquakes, according to researchers at UC Davis. The microbes can literally convert loose, sandy soil into rock. And men TO STONE!
I never thought such a thing was possible. Thanks N. Gitomer for the enlightening link.
Check out this joker's spacecraft
As private companies rush to the space travel industry's big bucks, we begin to enounter shitty spaceship design. Thanks Rosten Woo for the link.
LATEST POSTS
CATEGORIES
animal life (3)
earth life (11)
human life (21)
Mathematics Life (1)
outer space life (18)
sea life (2)
skullface life (5)
technology life (6)
UNIVERSE ARCHIVED
July 2007 (1)
June 2007 (2)
May 2007 (3)
April 2007 (3)
March 2007 (5)
February 2007 (3)
January 2007 (7)
December 2006 (1)
November 2006 (2)
October 2006 (3)
September 2006 (3)
August 2006 (4)
July 2006 (6)
June 2006 (3)
May 2006 (3)
April 2006 (3)
March 2006 (3)
February 2006 (4)
January 2006 (6)
December 2005 (5)
No, But Seriously
Archived From January 8, 2006
I am interested in the way scientific language changes with the passing of time. A sincere science* text, which is by nature written towards objectivity, has no more purpose when its objective ideals are proven to be incorrect. In its way, it becomes a kind of language poetry. Its uselessness becomes like the "uselessness" of literature.
You know what I mean: crazy 17th century biology books earnestly featuring seven-headed hydra, or charmingly innacurate old maps with dragon faces at their edges. Those are almost art pieces, or cultural monuments. “Popular Science” books from the 1950’s and 1960’s, are also good in this way, because they seem aware of themselves as both literary and educational objects. I think their charm is in how recently, comparatively speaking, they were written. They sound almost logical, but still brutishly, mawkishly, misinformed. Read now, these books are practically elegies for an era of scientific optimism and postwar American certainty that I find shattering. They are archaic and tender. Sometimes when you read real earnest Marine Biology texts by people like Rachel Carson, it's like meeting little curators and scientists puffing out their chests. You want to pat them on the head, in this one way.
Old science books also have a really interesting way of using to taxonomy to cathect "our" (ie, Humankind's) distance from the world into The Discipline We Call Science. The slime and dust of the world is notably absent, replaced by a sincere hammering-in of our role as guardsmen of a fallible world. As if we weren't part of it.
I think a similar gesture is made in most monster and horror movies from the same era as the American "Popular Science" boom: again, a cathexis or fetishization of our fear of nature into one incomprehensible beast. Be it a complex of academic jargon or a monster come from the depths, the fear is the same. King Kong is just a giant manifestation of our revulsion at the exotic. Godzilla is our guilt about nuclear warfare.
I like the way that these texts -- both the science books and the movies -- were so brazen in their time and seem so small now. Even the most seemingly well-founded scientific claims made in the 1950's, now proven wrong, are like unrequited love letters to a perfect and rational world which doesn't exist and probably never existed. Science books are love poetry books.
Yet, regardless, this kind of language's poetics are always unintentional, which puts a damper on my ribald aestheticization of it. And there are great limitations to objective prose. It only allows through the smallest of pores any mention of this illogical world. It cannot describe the grit of sand nor the breadth of emotional reaction to life. The problem lies in an inescapable tautology: to fully understand a scientific, taxonomic, objective conception of the natural world is to be so steeped in scientific idiom that poetics become impossible.
This is a loss, of course. At the same time, I think that there is a great joy in the destruction of the boundaries we're steeped in. It is evident to me that there is no boundary between ourselves and the world, because this boundary (long called Science) is as variable and flawed as the idea of boundaries themselves. Where does it end, you know?
* The words "science" and "sincere" are really damned close. Are my glasses broken or am I right?
<< | Posted on January 8, 2006 at 12:27 AM | >>
Comments (7):
but I'd say nothing's more poetic than the most heady stuff of the 'hardest' science: the branes of string theory; the hazy ambiguity of electrons. Hell, there are probably a dozen chapbooks titled "Dark Matter". Just because their work is full of jargon and peer-reviewd papers doesn't mean that scientists aren't grasping at truth with as much elegant flailing as poets. And both are just as successful, when it comes down to it (not at all). Cool blog, by the way.
Posted by Adrian @ January 10, 2006 10:38 PM
kinda of related, but its also funny how the politics of the scientists can effect the "truth". like if you have an idea outside of the regular accepted ideas you won't get funding to follow through to prove it, to become part of the mainstream consciousness. not just like "the world is flat" but this stuff even happens today which seems weird.
Posted by e*rock @ January 13, 2006 3:14 PM
I would like to think your assertion of an "inescapable tautology" is somewhat dubious, and that while Absolute Truth may not exist, there is still truth, and falsity, and those Pop Science magazines from the '50s are still more "true" than a seven-headed hydra.
What is interesting is that this type of idea, in the humanities, is seen as "reactionary" or "formalist."
So, it's funny. Scientists don't get funding if they believe in art, and arts/humanities scholars don't get funding if they believe in science.
Of course, all of this is changing--> http://plaisir.berkeley.edu/
Posted by Andrew V Peterson @ January 21, 2006 1:12 AM
Sure. Or maybe give it a couple of hundred years and Popular Science will seem as mawkish as a hydra. In any case, our truths are heavily dependent on the era in which we live.
I don't mean to be so absolutist. There are definitely some incredible conjunctions, especially in the humanities and the arts, where it seems a scientific aesthetic has become in vogue. Eduardo Kac is a good example, but even people like Damien Hirst do it.
Posted by Claire @ January 22, 2006 5:26 PM
There is a lot of interest in cryptozoology in the arts recently. Bates college in Maine is having a big lecture series about it, with accompanying art show.
Cryptozoology falls into what is called "fringe science" where a lot of speculative things are studied, and while many are the concepts of bonafide kooks, Gallileo was basically considered a fringe science proponent by supporting the Copernican idea that the sun was at the center of the solar system, not the earth. He was banished for being so silly.
A few months ago, a huge black panther-like feline was killed in Australia by a hunter who'd been hunting in his area for 50 years. For over 100 years, there have been stories of "big cats" in the woods in parts of Australia and it was chalked up in the cryptozoology indexes as yet another fictional-sighted animal like the bigfoot, yeti, basilisk, etc. Australia had no history of large feline species at all, no hair or droppings or animals ever found.
Now, in 2006 they are examining the DNA to figure out where it descended from.
Posted by solenoid @ July 9, 2006 11:27 PM
hey that shark vid was rad. i'll lay off the hotdogs and dinosaurs for now.
Posted by rita @ January 10, 2006 2:17 PM