urho
footer vimeo fogstock statesrights

Intense Interview: Alex by Alex M.

March 24, 2006 11:38 PM Permalink

UB: Good morning Alex, let's get started...

Alex: Okay, I am ready. I have my ICED SOY MOCHA.

UB: Before Ultimate Blogger started, what was your blogging philosophy?

Alex: Well, I've been "blogging" since late 1999. By blogging, I mean writing stuff online. I started this website "Digital Hearth" in late 1999 as a response to a book I was reading at the time in a Television and Culture course entitled "Electronic Hearth" which was about how the television has replaced the fireplace as the gathering place for the family. I saw the computer as a logical replacement for the television, thus, Digital Hearth instead of Electronic Hearth instead of Traditional Hearth. Originally I wanted it to be a blog about media and cultural criticism. But since then, I've gone through many life changes and periods of not blogging and gaining other interests. So recently, I've been blogging lots about music, design, Mac, politics, technology, and the media.

I suppose if I had to boil my blogging philosophy down, it would be about decentralized, DIY publishing outside of regular media mechanisms of control and hegemony. And blogging is certainly not limited to writing - blogging includes video, audio, music, photos, etc. It's quite wide ranging, in my view.
Just a sec, I need to put headphones on. I'm in a coffee shop and the noises are distracting.

UB: So why apply for Ultimate Blogger? Isn't that a more centralized, less DIY form of blogging?


Alex: I suppose it is more centralized in the sense that there is somebody directing or asking a question in order to focus your blogging. But this is a contest, not like a regular blog post that I would just write on the spur of the moment. The posts themselves are still very DIY. I decide what goes in them. I create the content. etc.

I watched the competition last year and it was really intriguing and entertaining. So much amazing content created, so many people pushing the boundaries and writing deeply personal yet accessible posts. I actually applied last year but didn't put too much thought or energy into my application. I wasn't sure if I wanted to apply this year, because I've been so ridiculously busy lately, but my friend Aaron Flint Jamison encouraged me to apply, because he thought I would do a good job. I also thought it would be a really good way to PUSH myself to interact with content on a deeper level, like creating posts that included video, audio, graphic design, tutorials, and community. So I decided to go ahead and jump in, because I thought would encourage me to blog deep. even though it has really cut back on the amount of sleep/proper nutrition I get, it has definitely been worth it.

UB: Well, you had some amazing entries. Which do you think was your best?


Alex: I really liked the Anacortes entry, both because it enabled me to use a variety of skills in my post and because it is a subject close to my heart. I love Anacortes and the people here, it is a beautiful and amazing community. So I wrote a rap about moving to Anacortes and the ghost of the first mayor and the lakes here, and Karl Blau (thanks for the beats, Jay!), and made a cheesy "soothing video" with Enya as the soundtrack, and also included images and text that are meaningful to me from the area. The expert post was also important to me, because it was so damn long and in depth and I felt like it was actually helpful to people. Took me so freaking long. Zoe's expert post was more useful to people, though and more succinct and accessible... uh...

UB: You only had two days for each challenge, was there any entry you rushed to finish and weren't especially proud of?


Alex: My worst entry by far was the "use 3 images to describe yourself" entry. A continuing problem that I had throughout the competition was that my digital camera broke about a week before UB started, (a stupid e18 error on a canon) so I had to rely on borrowed cameras the whole time. This was really annoying, as some didn't have video, or I wouldn't have access to one, etc. The image entry corresponded with a time when I didn't have access to borrowing a camera, so I had to rely on images already in my iphoto library. Also, I had to finish up a freelance site around that time so I was a bit pushed for time and TOTALLY uninspired. So I just decided to go cheesy/funny and photoshopped my severed head into pictures of animals that I had in my iphoto library. They were REALLY BAD photoshop jobs as well.

I actually tried to vote myself off after that challenge.

UB: Let's switch gears and talk about the game itself. Strategy... Before you "met" any of the other players, did you have a plan?


Alex: I am going to copy and paste my strategy that I sent to you guys before the contest started, when you asked me "what will your strategy be?":
STRATEGY: - Avoiding sleep at all costs
- Blasting Enya in my headphones for the entirety of the challenge
- Writing often and writing with grace, passion, and unmatched wit
- Making deeply meaningful and/or hilarious movies
- Writing and recording special songs just for Ultimate Blogger
- Forsaking grad school preparation (for example, reading extremely difficult and dry books such as this: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080701507…) in exchange for blogging
- Forsaking my regular blog, Digital Hearth - Forsaking my family and friends
- Forsaking my day job and freelance work
- Taking my laptop into the bathroom with me to blog (I poo four times a day, so I'm in there a lot)
- Subsisting for 4 weeks on TOFU dogs and Canadian rye whiskey - HAVING FUN!!!!!

UB: Any plans on making an alliance?


Alex: This iced soy mocha has a vaguely cheesy flavor to it. I knew that I would probably have to make alliances with people in order to get further in the game. but I didn't have any specific strategy for this. ICED CHEESE MOCHA... organic blue chevre. Sorry.

UB: Early in the game, there was a powerful alliance. Who did you align with, and how did that come to play?


Alex: I became online friends with Thom early on in the game. Even offline, as one of my bands was playing on UBC radio and he came and met me and videotaped me. He invited me to be a part of a big alliance he was forming with Zoe, Mike, Tim and Morgan, and Waferbaby. So yeah, it was a huge alliance: Thom, Zoe, Mike, Tim and Morgan, Waferbaby, and myself.

UB: This is what became known as the "Unholy Alliance", yes?


Alex: Indeed. The dirty alliance. The coalition of the filthy.

UB: Did you vote as instructed during the entire duration of the alliance?


Alex: No. I actually split the alliance later on. But let me digress. In the beginning, I felt a little weird about the alliance for two reasons: 1) it was mostly male and 2) we would just roll over everybody else regardless of merit until it got down to the final 6. BUT, the people I really liked the best were in the alliance and I knew that it would help me get further in the game (it is, after all, a contest) so I bit my lip and stayed in the alliance. I can copy and paste emails if you want juicy stuff.

UB: I'm always surprised about how riled up people get about being honest in a game like this. Do you think honesty in a "reality" game is a virtue?


Alex: Honesty is always a "virtue" (in the sense that it is a behavior that shows high moral standards) but it isn't necessarily an asset in a contest such as this. When I split the alliance, I was very misleading, but that was because I changed my mind about voting after saying I would vote one way. I will say that Tim displayed unwavering dedication to ethics and honesty during the game, and for this, he wins the virtue award. Especially because he never joined an alliance. He always voted according to merit.

UB: And made it quite far!


Alex: Yes, I am bummed that he didn't make it further. I tried my hardest to make it work but unfortunately, it didn't (or couldn't, with the alliance). I was very impressed by his posts and renaissance man skillset.

UB: When the Unholy Alliance crumbled, and you had to vote off one of your own, how did you make that decision?


Alex: Well, there was an alliance within the alliance. Thom, Zoe and Mike had an alliance and invited me to join after I joined the big alliance. So that alliance was Thom, Zoe, Mike, and I. And the plan was to vote off Daniel and Tim and Morgan once it got down to the nitty gritty. But I started feeling a bit weird about it, because it wasn't merit based AT ALL, it was just a group of people aiming to get far regardless of quality of post. Although we all had good posts. So when Tim won his second immunity, only the alliance was left, and we had to start voting off our own. The plan of the alliance within the alliance was to vote off Daniel and Tim and Morgan.

Thom sent out an email to the entire alliance saying "Well, it's finally come to this. Time to vote one of us off. My recommendation is to simply vote with your heart, no hard feelings. If we can vote tim off next time we will, unless they simply hand tim the immunity everytime. Good luck guys. thom "
BUt the plan was of our secret alliance was not, of course, to "vote with our hearts". Daniel and Tim and Morgan TOTALLY figured this out, of course, and they asked me to vote against Thom and Mike.

UB: So you were right in the middle!


Alex: So I had two options: vote with Thom and Zoe and Mike against Daniel and T & M, or vote with Daniel and T&T against Thom and Mike. Indeed, I was right in the middle. Swing vote. So I split my vote, and voted against Daniel and Mike. Very hard decision, but I wanted to really try and spice things up and split alliances to make things more exciting and interesting, possibly more merit based.

OH, before voting against Daniel and Mike, I tried to vote against myself and Mike, because my post was so crappy. but you guys wouldn't let me vote against myself. Just thought i'd put that in there.

After that challenge and split vote, the contestants left were Thom, Zoe, Tim, T&M, and myself and I told everybody I wasn't making any more alliances. and after that, I didn't.

Thom was really disappointed in me, and rightly so because I told him I was going to vote against Daniel and the kids and then I changed my vote. So I did mislead him. But in retrospect I'm glad I made that decision. The decision to split the vote wasn't based on me getting further in the game, it was to try and make it more interesting, voting wise. I think an unintended consequence was me getting further.

UB: Do you think you are more of an Ultimate Blogger than Tim and Morgan?

Alex: Well, if I said no, I wouldn't want to be the ultimate blogger, right? I think they are hilarious, smart, and precocious, and I am happy that I have two new friends. But I think I've demonstrated a more varied and complex approach to blogging. I like blogs that have a wide-ranging variety of subjects and media presentation: writing, humour, tutorials, songs, podcasts, etc. Although I definitely think that Tim and Morgan have it in them to be multi-faceted bloggers, it seems like this competition focused mainly on their video skills. (I HAVE TO TAKE A BATHROOM BREAK) Alex: I finished urinating.

UB: Let's say something happened and you got disqualified... Who of the eliminated contestants would you bring back into the game?

Alex: TIM. I would bring tim back. I was also really bummed that Tina got voted off so early. Her videos were so quirky and weird. That was kind of a mistake, actually, on the part of the alliance. Somebody jumped the gun and voted early without establishing consensus so the whole alliance had to vote as an evil bloc.

UB: Any last plea you'd like to make?


Alex: Well, it's understandable that there would be feelings of resentment toward me and other members of the alliance, because obviously it was a pretty harsh voting arrangement. Looking back, I wouldn't have formed an alliance with so many people, because even though it's a "competition," it sort of pushes the limits of fairness. I normally consider myself a pretty ethical/honest person, and it's weird how a survival-based contest such as this can test those boundaries.

UB: That is one of my favorite parts of reality shows. They create a new temporary reality.


Alex: That being said, I think I tried my hardest (with the exception of the "3 images post") to put together a creative, entertaining, multi-facted, and interesting response to each challenge. So I would hope that fellow Ultimate Bloggers would take that into account when making their vote. The "survival" thing is interesting. I've never seen any of those shows, cause I haven't had a TV (with the exception of for a few months) since I was 19. The only context I had for it was last year's blogging competition. and it got pretty intense! I can only imagine what happens when there's $1 million at stake.

My girlfriend Megan thought that this is more of a social experiment than a blogging competition. Like, how will people respond when put into this new temporary context of competition and voting against each other?

UB: Thanks Alex. I think that wraps it up rather nicely.

By: Alex M. | Challenge 07 | March 24, 2006

Comments:

I'm going to level with you - I'm not reading either of these. To have the competition end on this note is kinda disappointing, and they are too long by half. My mind was made up on who I was voting for before this happened, and it's barely more than a coin flip. Nice job getting this far.

1 Thom 12:38 AM on 03/25/06

Tim-
Sorry I doubted your sincerity just because your email came by bulkmail.

2 SG Pierce 7:44 AM on 03/25/06

Its ok. Jona, who was the dark shadowy figure?

3 Tim 8:08 AM on 03/25/06

I would like to go on the record as saying the truly "honest" thing to do when you voted against Mike and against the alliance was to have told Mike before you did it. Then he could have had the opportunity to vote against you. You saved your ass on that one while hiding behind principals.

So in the end, it really was more dicky than principaled (and I've thought a lot about this).

4 Zoe 8:25 AM on 03/25/06

not that my opinion means anything to those that have already made friends and lost friends on this ultimate journey...

but.

isn't winning self centered to begin with? as is blogging?

seems to me that in this setting, preservation is key. and self preservation is very darwinistic at its root level, and darwin, as we've been told is about survival of the fittest? which is basically winning? so, whats the big deal?

mr. digital hearth did what he had to do, now he's in the final. big deal, right? i don't know?

so i'll continue only for a little bit more... if my crystal balls tell the future correctly, T&M will win and be TOTALLY MORE INTERNET FAMOUS than before. which is cool. alex will be be relegated to 2nd best blogger in the bloggerverse, which aint too bad. though it might have been nice to see him win... but dicky moves beget dicky moves and even the most left leaning vegetarian bloggers (big assumption i know, maybe "left leaning food eating bloggers that prefer to eat vegitarian fare but are not afraid of meat" is more.... ) are just human in the end. and to quote the TV version of the Big Lebowski... "This is what happens Larry. This is what happens, when you find, a man, in the alps!"

whew..
thanks to steve, mike and jona, you dudes deserve the ultimate blogger award in my book. top notch and doubley better than last year! OMG. RADNESS.

5 elias 1:56 PM on 03/25/06

The fact is, ultimate blogger is and should always be about who is the best blogger, overall, completely.

NOT who is funniest or quirkiest

In this respect, the competition has been swaying back and forth as a result of the alliances. This is a big disappointment for viewers-as i have watched/read this competition avidly- but it is not an unexpected outcome.

In the end, voters should vote with the central idea of the competition in mind because no matter how you look at it- both of the finalists screwed other people over.

My vote was always for alex because i know he will always have interesting blogs ( like daniel peterson sp?)

6 Nolan 2:37 PM on 03/25/06

I find it interesting that Zoe was part of the alliance that voted off all the chicks and then tried to play the female card when she was the only one left. Women...

Oh, and sometimes, I hide behind my principals at school, but only when the kids are throwing things at me. Or sometimes, if I'm sitting behind my desk counting all of my money, I'll hide behind my principal.

Sorry...didn't mean to be mean here, but if you played dirty, you played dirty. That's it. There's no reason to try to measure who played dirtier. Go Alex!

7 Sonny 11:03 AM on 03/26/06

I actually really don't think that Ultimate Blogger is about who is the best blogger. It's about who survives the game. And to survive the game, sometimes you have to play dirty. Honestly, I thought Alex should have voted off T/M because I think that Zoe would have been the more challenging opponent--and the game is also about challenging your blogging skills.

But it's also about winning--so I think that Alex chose the opponent he thought he could win over. Principles don't really mean much in this game--all the entrants were good bloggers, but the best blogger? I think those that were the best have already been voted off.

I apologize in advance because I know this post will offend people--but that's not my intent--I'm just offering my opinion, take it or leave it.

8 Sweet Lucy 6:32 PM on 03/26/06

maybe the name should be changed to the "Ultimate Alliance...er".

9 johncey 12:14 AM on 03/27/06