audience – PICA http://urbanhonking.com/pica Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:24:54 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Jérôme Bel – Pichet Klunchun and Myself http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/12/jerome_bel_pichet_klunchun_and_2/ http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/12/jerome_bel_pichet_klunchun_and_2/#respond Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:49:53 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/12/jerome_bel_pichet_klunchun_and_2/ Continue reading ]]> Posted by: Benjamin Adrian
Sitting through Jérôme Bel’s piece, “Pichet Klunchun and Myself” was mostly unlike the typical performance tba holds in Lincoln Hall. There was a bit of dancing, but conversation filled more time. Jérôme begins questioning Pichet about his practice of Kohn, a classical Thai dance. Pichet proceeds to give a basic crash course in Kohn. Jérôme tries out some moves, and the entire audience begins to appreciate Kohn, and Pichet’s impressive command of it. In regard to Kohn, the piece appears to be more instructional than presentation.
And then the roles switch.


Pichet takes a similar tack to querying Jérôme on his artistic practice. Being about as familiar with Jérôme’s previous work as Pichet’s (not very) I followed along raptly. In demonstration and philosophic anecdotes Bel’s work is revealed as being minimalist performance pieces which attempt to forge a particular relationship between the performer and the audience; one of equality, in that the audience feels on par with the performers. The idea is to not have the audience awestruck by the abilities being displayed, making it theatre, rather than the Olympics.
I am struck by the way in which the role of audience takes on such an elevated persona (increasingly I think this about the whole of tba, not just this piece). Jérôme introduces himself by performing the role of an inquisitive recipient: he acts an audience. Once Pichet takes over the questioning, and Bel takes the stand, we hear the reasoning behind his own style of performance. This aligns the ‘artist’ to ‘audience’ in a more orthodox manner, however, Klunchun performs the audience role in such a way as to reveal an affinity to Bel’s aesthetic understanding.
Death carries much significance in Kohn dance, so I was curious if Bel would depict it in his performances. He does. Pichet reacts to it by reflecting on the death of his own mother. Jérôme is satisfied and explains he views the theatre as a venue for opportunities just like this one- moments of reflection. Bel explains he wants his work to open time and space for the audience, to expand the possibilities available for them and to mull about ideas within the context of their own lives, not the performers.
Reflecting on Jérôme’s points about anti-spectacle artwork, I see how opposed Pichet’s work is to such a framework. In seeing Kohn dance, Jérôme himself eventually becomes impressed; he displays the antithesis of what he would like to elicit from audiences. We see the type of reaction Jérôme aims for demonstrated by Pichet. Referring to the theatre, Jérôme asks “what can happen in this place?” and his piece resoundingly answers the question: anything.

]]>
http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/12/jerome_bel_pichet_klunchun_and_2/feed/ 0
Sojourn Theatre BUILT http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/09/sojourn_theatre_built/ http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/09/sojourn_theatre_built/#respond Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:04:18 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/09/sojourn_theatre_built/ Continue reading ]]> Not knowing exactly what to expect from Sojourn Theatre’s BUILT, I pedaled south into the new South Waterfront district with an eye on the construction. There is an abundance of street signs directing multi-modal streets, which cut through towering buildings that look unused. Whatever the performance would hold, I already was thinking about building and the magnitude of what the city is undertaking here.
The piece itself consisted of many hands-on activities, independent at first, but with groups progressively growing in size. At times, the actors seemed more like facilitators, or tour guides. Techniques of having brief interaction with various media reminded me of recent Hand2Mouth theatre work. The content had to do with our priorities for living spaces and the design of an ideal city; the entire audience selected parts of a city that you would like to live near to, and distance yourself from. We were given facts about population growth in Portland over the decades to come and the inevitability of answering the question, how do we want to live? How would you like to design your community?
The emphasis was on the personal, having the audience examine our own point of view on wants versus needs, and boundaries we set for ourselves in our journey from private life to public. A good part of the theatrical piece includes an active audience; BUILT works to make the experience performative. One section of the show included a multiple-choice survey of our collective values on community issues and personal relationships. For instance, when was the last time you were in an argument? In the last day, last week, last month? Our answers were anonymously tallied and projected.
My role as audience member flowed into participant and by the end I thought of myself as having taken part in a process that we all were taking part in. These ‘active audience moments’ help frame conventional moments of watching actors; a tightrope scene features two performers in vocal dialogue about desires and needs in life, with simultaneous physical dialogue consisting in a tightrope performance. The delight of watching the dance was tempered by the voices which revealed ambiguity and fear, with personal resonance.
Posted by: Benjamin Adrian

]]>
http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2008/09/09/sojourn_theatre_built/feed/ 0