http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2007/09/17/tba07_day_eleven_sunday_16_sep/ Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:29:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2007/09/17/tba07_day_eleven_sunday_16_sep/#comment-755 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:28 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/pica/2007/09/17/tba07_day_eleven_sunday_16_sep/#comment-755 “Even when I try to paint a context, to frame a negative criticism within the comfy nest of the many other wonderful aspects of the rest of the show, or the rest of the artist’s intentions…”
Tell me where in your “review” of Ten Tiny Dances did you do any of this? You can’t because you didn’t. You don’t even understand the difference between “negative” criticism, which shouldn’t be the point of an informed and intelligent reviewer and CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, which is. And you painted no context whatsoever, else you would have understood both the why and what of the mini-dances by Barber and Wilkes. You would have pointed out some of the true flaws and shortcomings of the show other than Mike Barber’s COSTUMING, not “underwear.” You really don’t get it at all… But I know what your problem is. I do! Look up Narcissistic Personality Disorder on wikipedia. That’s you to a tee!

]]>