header UrbanHonking Home
side_header
KENNETH MICHELANGELO MAXIMILLIAN
KmikeyM.com: Buy Shares!
K5M.org: Project Space
Twitter

Recent Flickr Pictures

Fine del . icio . us Hyperlinks

A Gentleman's Archives

Cooking Like A Hot Knife

Winning $75 on 65 or Lower

El valor sin dinero: KMIKEYM.COM

A Great Shareholder Meeting

Shareholder Meeting

More...



Site and Design Credits

Site Design by YACHT & Emily Johnson

KmikeyM portrait by Corey Lunn

Powered by MT 4.0

side-footer

Winning $75 on 65 or Lower

|

I have a bet set up about the critical reception of the new Indiana Jones film. My gut feeling is that the film will not be better than "pretty good." Using Metacritic as a reference point I can see that they rated The Last Crusade a 65. While still favorable, a 65 is, like The Last Crusade, a pretty forgettable film.

So my bet was that the Crystal Skull will do no better than Last Crusade. This was a $20 bet that was upped to $50 after seeing the CG effects of the first trailer. My betting opponent was very sure of himself, and we made another $20 bet, this time with the film needing to get over 70.

ij4-proj.jpg

Now I'm sitting here refreshing the Metacritic page watching the reviews come in, and the idea hits me that maybe I can predict the scores of the reviews. So I take a few films that are in the same range; films like The Bank Job, Redbelt, and Horton Hears a Who! and I look at what each critic rated that film. Some sources seem to have a clear tendency to rate high (Entertainment Weekly) while others seem a little harsher on average (Austin Chronicle).

After making some mildly educated guesses I predicted a final score of 67, two points shy of my ultimate $70 win. But Metacritic is a strange beast, and the actual published score seems to be lower than the average of all the review by a point or two. So I held out hope.

ij4-66.jpg

Right now the score is down to an agonizing 66. Just one point away. Metacritic tends to collect at least 30 reviews, and the 66 only represents 25, so the number could easily shift up or down. I guess at this point I just have to wait and hope that the Austin Chronicle, Christian Science Monitor, or the Washington Post hates it.

<< | Posted by kmikeym at 5:01 PM | >>

flouish
footer