Comments on: In Time http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/ Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:56:57 +0000 hourly 1 By: Lee http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-2037 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:18:32 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-2037 Why were JT and Amanda running out of town? Also the car Leon got into in the final scene, whos car was that? It was a police car but he pulled someone out of the drivers seat so it wasnt his? Been really bugging me!

]]> By: Steve Terry http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-2031 Thu, 05 Jul 2012 01:29:26 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-2031 I loved In Time. True, after seeing it once, I immediately labeled it a “B” movie with dialogue written at a level suitable for 15-year-old consumption.

However I am now convinced that this will be a cult classic that will last forever. The concept is so cool. The old people all look 25. The use of green on walls both interior and outside was really pleasing to the eye.

The music was good. The cars were cool.

Cillian Murphy.

Amanda Seyfried’s eyes and wig.

I love “In Time”

]]> By: Dixy http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-1935 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:58:02 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-1935 Did you notice when Amanda Seyfried and JT runs through the desert quite to the end…JT gets time from the time keepers car and runs back to seyfried to give her time…her shoes change…when she runs into his arms shes wearing a somehwat low heel compared wht shes wearing after they get up…check it out…:D

]]> By: andy http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-1631 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:08:28 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-1631 nooooo! meant: you couldnt ! be more right about the movie’s straight forwardness and Cillian’s hotness. forgive for i have sined

]]> By: andy http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-1630 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:05:43 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-1630 oh god! i just saw it again last night so its super fresh in my mind. you are so right with the “fights like a bad ass black belt even though he’s a poor schlub working in a factory” part. and you could more right about that movie’s ridiculous straight forwardness, or for Cillian’s hotness for that mattet!

]]> By: Yours Truly http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-1207 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:14:45 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-1207 these are really good points. I totally forgot about the car crash, but you raise an issue that really bugged me, which was a real loose use of time itself. Like the mom running for 2 hours apparently? The time on the arms never seemed to match the actual living time in the film. IT WAS SO CRAZY

]]> By: Jordan http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-1205 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:01:10 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-1205 I thought for sure you would mention than horrible and disgusting car crash. I don’t know if that was a toy car, a well made claymation or the worst CGI since Jar Jar Binx, but what was going on! It was like someone clipped a part of a different movie right into that scene. I really thought something was wrong, until I finished the movie and realized it fit right into the rest of the crap of the movie. And I swear their arms said two hours when they started driving, at the dead of night, and then they wake up at about 9:00 am driving with only 5 min left. WHAT?!?! Worst CGI in this decade.

]]> By: side wiener http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-602 Wed, 02 Nov 2011 07:35:48 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-602 damn it, i was going to see this on thursday. now i’ll have to watch logan’s run and the island back to back to back really fast. at least i don’t have to buy any tickets – so thanks i guess.

]]> By: Josh http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-538 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:59:48 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-538 Matt really liked the movie! I felt bad talking shit about it so didn’t participate too much, but boy was it shitty. Andrew Niccol talks about it in interviews very straight-facedly as “the child of Gattaca“. And he talks about he made that movie 15 whole years ago and has been wanting to explore the theme of “the ultimate in genetic engineering” — turning off the aging gene.

News to me — the movie was about turning off the aging gene? I just thought that was a good excuse for casting only hot 25-year-olds.

]]> By: Rch http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/2011/10/29/in-time/#comment-523 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:48:29 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/isawthat/?p=449#comment-523 thanks this rules you said it 100% accurately it almost redeems the “Time” i “spent” to see this goners cooperatively written movie.

]]>