http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/ Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:26:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-326 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:41:30 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-326 Yes, Its really an interesting thinking. Social networking should have to look into this matter also. Nice info Thanks

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-325 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:38:51 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-325 Facebook has em. They don’t make them easy to get, but they have em. You can get your friends status updates as one feed and “news” items from your friends as another. I unsubscribed from those feeds long ago.

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-324 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:53:48 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-324 I think 3 is the predominant reason today, with the others as factors. There are people working on putting ads in feeds. An always connected mobile Internet at a cheap flat rate and devices able to usefully present feeds on the small screen will make it happen. btw take a look at Loopt

]]> http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-323 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:53:01 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/ideasfordozens/2007/12/05/why_dont_social_networks_provi/#comment-323 Flickr for example, has RSS for EVERYTHING!

]]>