Paul Cameron luvs teen sex.
Anyone familiar with the evangelical right's rhetoric about homosexuality has undoubtedly run across the work of Paul Cameron. As chairman of the Family Research Institute in Colorado Springs, Cameron has made a career out of publishing studies that supposedly offer scientific justification for antigay public policy, depicting gays as diseased perverts. Of course, his studies are so flawed and biased as to render them entirely meaningless; Cameron was even thrown out of the American Psychological Association for violating ethical principles and repudiated by the American Sociological Association for posing as a sociologist. Nevertheless his work is still frequently referenced by relatively "mainstream" opponents of LGBT rights. When William Bennett claims "the best available research suggests that the average lifespan of male homosexuals is around 43 years of age", he's talking about one of Cameron's bogus studies. When televangelist Rod Parsley stands next to Texas Governor Rick Perry, celebrating the passage of yet another anti-marriage amendment and says "Gay sex is a veritable breeding ground for disease", when the American Family Association claims gays are more likely than heteros to molest children, or some nutjob on the internet starts shrieking about how gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners a year, they're talking about Cameron's work. His research has even shown up in state supreme court opinions in Massachusetts and Florida, in service of arguments that discrimination can be justified for public health reasons.
So, no secret that dude doesn't like the gays. But here's what's news to me: Cameron actually tells parents to encourage their teenagers to engage in heterosexual sex play as a method of warding off homosexuality!
In a 1978 book called Sexual Gradualism, Paul Cameron offered a "solution to the sexual dilemma of teenagers and young adults." The man who would go on to become America's most vitriolic anti-gay researcher proposed that teenagers and unmarried adults be encouraged by their parents, church leaders and society in general to engage in sexual activity that gradually increases in intensity, but always stops short of "going all the way" before marriage. What follows are excerpts from the meandering, 70-page manual, which is part social theory, part how-to guide.Gradualism is a process-oriented approach to learning the physical skills of sexuality in step with gaining maturity in the psychological aspects of sexual intimacy. Gradualism is anchored on set levels of sexuality activity. These levels are:
Level 1: Being near another.
Level 2: Holding hands, hugging and the like.
Level 3: Kissing.
Level 4: Breast fondling.
Level 5: Mutual hand exploration of the genitals.
Level 6: Total nudity, perhaps in a bathtub. Manual stimulation.
Level 7: Oral sex.
Level 8: The final level of sexual intimacy.Level 5 is the break-off point. Only people who truly love can care enough to handle beyond Level 5. Level 5 provides 60 percent of the overall fun of sex.
Gradualism would best be practiced at home. A responsible set of parents might allot a room, privacy, access to a bathroom, a television, and snacks to their teen-agers to practice gradualism. Some parents may shudder at this prospect. But they should remember that the minute a teenager leaves in a car, he or she is able to do anything desired.
Another advantage of gradualism is the insulation value it provides against homosexuality. By gradually introducing a young person to the opposite sex, gradualism steers in a heterosexual direction. While no parent wants his child starting the sexual process "too young," better too young than homosexual. (Link)
To this, I say, huzzah! It's about time the Christian right came out in favor of teenage bathtub handjobs. And parents providing snacks would be such a thoughtful touch! What teenager hasn't found himself thinking, mid-breast-fondle, "Damn, what I wouldn't give for a can of Pringles and some Sunny D right about now!"
Further reading:
An overview of Cameron's career from the SPLC's Intelligence Report.
An extended discussion of Cameron's bogus methods.
Categories
Christianity , Ethical issues , Evangelicalism , Protestantism0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Paul Cameron luvs teen sex..
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.urbanhonking.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/755

SWEET FUCKING GOD! WHAT THE FUCK AM I READING?? "PERHAPS IN A BATHTUB?" Wow. This guy certainly eclipses the weirdness of Newt Gingrich's "future honeymoon possibilities in space" musings.
This is mindblowing, Kevin.
Which step is "Blue Balls"?
Hmmm. Maybe we can show this to the abstinent-until-marriage proponents. We can make our kids remain sex free if we only allowed them to practice hand jobs and make sure they get off from them. How's that for school instruction?
Then again, to some extent this sort of instruction is implied in other countries. They just call it "outercourse" and let teens know that there are safer ways to experience sexual pleasure.
This is an excellent thing to know and it is hilarious.
What about the teenagers, though, which teenager wouldn't be creeped out by the idea of a parent encourageing them to go have a bath with so and so while mom and dad wait downstairs?
It would probably make any teenager with attraction for persons of the same sex completely traumatized about spending time naked with the opposite sex...
on a different note:
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/01/25/iran12535.htm
The ideas this asshole is espousing are actually reasonable. They have been discussed for years in various teen academic resources and in cognitive science. Teens are very concrete thinkers (aren't we all) and have trouble with the decision tree needed to incorporate the numerous possible outcomes of an events such as becoming sexually involved. Giving a clear line, beyond which not to go works best in these situations. The common tendency is to make the line way toooooo stringent, like "you can kiss, but no french", etc. This is too restrictive and when a teen goes too far, like to second base, there is no reason not to go further.
In addition, this is common practice in some of the nirthern European countries, eg Denmark, where snuggling and co-sleeping is very much like what is described above.
that is not to say that having a god damned, hypocritical, sack of dominionist shit is correct, only that he is stealing from the ideas of other, more reasoned thinkers.
Omg, "the kids of today should defend themselves against the 70s"! Meaning, perhaps the era had something to do with this bizarre inspiration...like maybe it was the blow talking.
Kevin, you're blog is wonderful, even though it hurts to read it at times. A note related to your thesis: on my way to Venezuela I stopped off in Seattle and saw, in Ballard I believe, the very blend of hipster and evangelical culture you were analyzing in your thesis (which I still really want to read, btw) in a church there. They've got minimalist style, rock concerts, and probably a wicked BBQ grill, too. Do you know which place I'm talking about?