DVD: I ♥ Huckabees
Director David O. Russell describes I ♥ Huckabees as an attempt to introduce audiences to the principles of Eastern Religion, particularly Buddhism, without framing these principles in explicitly religious terms. The film seems to target a young progressive audience that is aware that something is very wrong with the state of the world but is feeling alienated and somewhat hopeless. You know, people like me, and like you and like most of our friends have been feeling since November 2. That audience is personified in Albert (Jason Schwartzman), a frustrated environmental activist, who recruits a pair of existential detectives (Dustin Hoffman & Lily Tomlin) to unravel his personal mysteries.
Huckabees teaches so artfully and efficiently that we barely notice that we're learning. Complex Buddhist concepts seem like common sense; Hoffman's character (based on Buddhist teacher Robert Thurman) demonstrates, with the help of a blanket, in 30 seconds, the concept of interbeing-everything is everything else. We learn of interconnectedness: between people, between events, between the psychological and the interpersonal, and the political. We learn of impermanence as we watch Albert and his sleazy corporate arch-nemesis Brad (Jude Law) experience devastating losses. But along with Albert, we learn how to be compassionate toward Brad; we learn to see that even our "enemies" are suffering. It is this insight that allows Albert (and us) to let go of our attachment to anger and move on.
The movie is not a thinly disguised religious tract promoting Buddhism as an easy ticket to Happytown. It is honest about the temptation and dangers posed by nihilism dressed up in a zen disguise. This is important because the whole "fuck as many people and do as many drugs as I can and ignore the consequences because I am beyond good and evil" mentality has haunted American Buddhism since Kerouac and Ginsberg.
The portrayal of a family of a typical American evangelical Christians needs a little work. Russell depicts the family as warm-hearted but narrow-minded and oblivious to their complicity in world problems. Sadly, that sounds about right. But he gets the theology behind their arrogance wrong when he has the clueless daughter state that “Jesus is never mad at us if we live with him in our hearts.” Actually, very few evangelical christians would say that. Russell seems to be hypothesizing that their confidence in their salvation-by-grace is responsible for their self-righteousness and lack of attention to social justice, but in fact personal piety and the struggle against sin remains a focus even for those who consider themselves "saved". A more nuanced diagnosis would find that the real issue is the shift in emphasis from social holiness to private personal holiness since the 19th century, or what Jim Wallis calls the "great heresy of 20th century American Evangelicalism."
Not enough films have something important and substantive to say beyond an interesting story or a character study. Huckabees doesn't provide empty escapism or deny how screwed up the world is, but still leaves you feeling hopeful and empowered to keep fighitng the good fight. And it's all delivered with sincerity and humor, like a little smiling buddha in movie form. I ♥ this movie.
Please read this cool interview with David O. Russell, written by Jeffery Overstreet for Christianity Today. It features a guest appearance by devout catholic/sexy underwear model Mark Walhberg, who says of the film, rather confusingly, but sincerely: "It's all about Jesus"
Categories
Buddhism , Evangelicalism , Film0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: DVD: I ♥ Huckabees.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.urbanhonking.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/726

It's interesting that you'd go out of your way to defend, even champion Hollywood's version of Buddhism, but capitulate to the mainstream understanding and definiton of Beat, ref. your "beyond good and evil" clap-trap.
Why don't you heed Russell's advice and look for the interconnectedness? If it weren't for the beats and some of the more positive elements of what they explored and popularized there would be no Russell, no underground musical and cultural underground, etc.
mister beat dude,
my intention is not to hate on the beats or denigrate or define their legacy. an extended discussion of the beat movement would reflect on both the positives and negatives, and there are many of both. It is certainly true that the beats helped popularize eastern religious ideas. it's also true that they helped popularize abandonment of sexual ethics and heavy drug use as false ways of being "radical". American buddhists have had to wrestle with the fallout of that mentality. Also the idea that without the beats there would be no "underground musical and cultural underground" is completely weird. As if there were no underground music/cultures prior to their boring books! Let's get out of the romance.
if everything is connected, one thing can not exist without another, the underground would be extremely different without the beats and their influence. they had an enormous influence on hippie subculture, eastern religion in america, performance art which spawned performance poetry, political activism, drug culture, the development of various political movements--maybe most notably the gay rights movement, etc, etc, etc. It's akin to removing The Beatles and everyone they've had a profound influence over from the pantheon of rock music.
reverse performance art and performance poetry
Well yeah, like I said, pros and cons. Cultural movements generally leave mixed legacies. I think it's important to understand that the insight of interbeing is a tool for cultivating empathy and understanding but isn't a way to excuse ourselves from the task of critical reflection and evaluation. Influential does not equal good.
Example: St. Augustine is one of the most influential thinkers on our modern society. You and I would not exist as we are today without Augustine. That doesn't mean that I shouldn't critically evaluate his ideas and legacy; in fact it makes that critical analysis more important so that his continuing influence can be identified, understood, and when necessary, corrected. If I mention in passing that Augustine's ideas about sex and original sin kinda sucked and remain something that Christianity has to overcome, that doesn't mean i consider Augustine worthless or a wholly negative cultural force.