Dial J For Fire

Julianne Escobedo Shepherd:
STEADY GUM POPPIN, H.B.I.C.

ASK ABOUT ME:

VIBE

MTV's URGE

VH-1.com

SPIN

Pitchfork

the Jane Mag webyrinth

Let's Get Linky

MAGNA CARTA

July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

(212) 688-6262

FROM September 21, 2005

Hillary Clinton owes a good portion of her political success to the upswing in activist feminism after the Anita Hill testimony/Clarence Thomas hearings. So how can she still... STILL be on the fucking fence about john roberts? hillary was never entirely what we (idealist feminists) wanted her to be but lo, sign of the times, she keeps selling us out for the sake of her perceived political future--which, hate to say it my dear, but it ain't happening, particularly if you keep leaning back into the money-dirty arms of the right and giving the rest of us the Reed dis*.

*(the reed dis, as defined by my former colleague and reed alumni katia dunn, is when a person is friendly to you in class, but outside campus is all "do i know you?" young jeezy style.)

<< | Posted on September 21, 2005 at 4:11 PM | >>

Comments (4):

ummm hillary cares about hillary. i will never - ever get the image that is burned into my brain out. that image is of the senate standing on the steps of capitol hill.. reciting the pledge of fucking allegiance and YELLLING the 'under god' part.. a couple of years ago. there's hillary, right in the middle, yelling like a 3rd grader trying to.. umm yell about something.

screw hillary (figuratively).

el s on at

yeah, it's been really disappointing. I mean, obviously all politicians have to sell their souls in order to get to the top (i.e. we couldn't have some bra-less long-haired strong-opinioned (i.e. shrill) non-cookie-making un-married unapologetic woman senator because they'd eat her alive), but that doesn't make it any more palatable when it happens. Still, I'll vote for her when she runs. She'll certainly be a better option than whatever lunatic the republicans put up against her. If only for the fact that we all know she secretly doesn't give a shit about "under god."

ritchey on at

i think she's doing what she needs to to be elected, in the end having a female president will be "good for america" and if it takes what hillary is doing to get there thats ok. she probably will sell out half a dozen issues, but given all that she's still not bad

jck on at

i think jck makes a good point. . . besides, the way to sell her presidency to the mainstream male voter (because we all know that even though it's the second millenium and all it'll still be a significantly difficult and monumental task to elect a female president) is to keep reminding them that this would be an excellent opportunity, yet again, for Bill. He would be, after all, the first First Man. . . it makes me laugh just thinking about it, but seriously it might just make the half of the country that's afraid to vote for a woman change their minds.

rhoops on at

Post a comment:




Remember Me?