Dial J For Fire

Julianne Escobedo Shepherd:
STEADY GUM POPPIN, H.B.I.C.

ASK ABOUT ME:

VIBE

MTV's URGE

VH-1.com

SPIN

Pitchfork

the Jane Mag webyrinth

Let's Get Linky

MAGNA CARTA

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

a few important facts

FROM February 7, 2005

Gawker reminds us today that Inside Deep Throat is amassing press. I have not seen the film, but I want to refresh our memories on Linda Lovelace's post-porn life, that in two autobiographies--Ordeal and Out of Bondage--she detailed physical, emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of her manager/husband/pimp, Chuck Traynor, which lasted until she escaped, found god, and had two kids with a cable TV installer named Larry Marchiano. She denounced her whole porn career, claiming she was essentially battered into filming Deep Throat at the hearings for the anti-porn civil ordinance in Minneapolis, 1983. In 2002, she died in a car accident after a lifelong battle with alcoholism.

Here's an interview with the directors--they believe her story; I hope in the film they do not gloss over the difficult parts about Linda. Discussing the facts of her life would be very useful in examining Deep Throat's cultural impact, which is the point of the movie, apparently.

<< | Posted on February 7, 2005 at 5:39 PM | >>

Comments (1):

you should also know that the film looks at those issues as well as the fact that she went, openeyed, back into the porn industry in the last years before she died. the film is bad, but it is so because it's just another flick glorifying/rationalizing every aspect of the 60s. lovelance comes off as a victim for another reason--a woman so dim that she followed everyone who led her, from porn "filmmakers" to gloria steinem, who i typically like but never has come off worse than when she's talking "for" linda while she sits there dumbly--just as she did with men before the feminist movement and she found each other. the whole story is sordid, that's for sure.

lisa on at

Post a comment:




Remember Me?