Comments on: decisions, decisions http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/ By Matt McCormick Fri, 23 Sep 2016 06:31:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Lindsay http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-310 Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:36:15 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-310 Upon first looking, I definitely gravitated to the first one. The first one is more visually striking, so if that’s what you’re going for, then my vote is version 1.

]]>
By: Alain LeTourneau http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-309 Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:28:06 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-309 You should only ask close friends these type of questions, otherwise you are liable to get some bad advice. Of couse, no offensive to those who have given you their advice.

]]>
By: JCC http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-308 Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:47:06 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-308 The target-magig looks like it’s trying to catch the cloud in the top photo. I was instantly impressed.
Two looks like a photo I would take. (I’m a total amateur.)

]]>
By: ryan Smith http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-307 Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:30:57 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-307 number one for sure. both are truly beautiful, but as i have learned in the past – go towards your instincts. my eyes sucked towards that one like a magnet (the sky, the ground, the framing.) really beautiful work man. lets hang soon.

]]>
By: Abe http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-306 Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:17:02 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-306 Number Two! You get a better sense of the space around the target, and the distance allows the target to speak for itself, whereas the first one kind of forces “menacing”.

]]>
By: lucie http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-305 Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:53:09 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-305 I like the sky and ground better in v1.

]]>
By: Jen Elliott http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-304 Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:05:59 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-304 I like 2.
#2 has more grit. it reveals the authentic character of the subject more. Thin, empty, somewhat viscious & lonely. more sam peckinpah.
#1 falls under the hyper-romantic landscape that sentimentalizes even ugly subjects. I do appreciate pretty clouds.

]]>
By: Mr. Verne http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-303 Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:10:03 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-303 I like v. 1 better as well. The sky is nice but the ground is more interesting to me.

]]>
By: Dad http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-302 Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:41:24 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-302 Okay, one’s nice, but two is better. The sky is better; the long thin shadow from the poles is great and the cracks in the ground are sharper making an interesting contrast with the sky.
What bothers me about both of them is the vision of some guy named Bubba with a gun in one hand and a beer in the other out there spraying lead all over the landscape.

]]>
By: Nanna http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-301 Thu, 31 May 2007 19:01:43 +0000 http://urbanhonking.com/actionitems/2007/05/31/decisions_decisions/#comment-301 Yep, me too like the firs one, because of the nice natural contrast of the light. The cracks & misty feeling are pretty at the second one though…
But i also like fluffy clouds…
Good luck!

]]>